A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A Study of Nutrient Retention Dynamics in Vegetated and Non-Vegetated Bioretention Mesocosms
Bioretention systems are stormwater treatment devices installed to remove both dissolved and particulate pollutants. As stormwater percolates through the bioretention system, dissolved pollutants are removed from solution by chemical and biological processes. In our study, 20 bioretention mesocosms (10 with loamy sand and 10 with sandy loam, half with and half without vegetation) were used to investigate hydraulic behavior and dissolved nutrient retention. The mesocosms were dosed with 120L to 160L synthetic stormwater comprising 0.8 mg-l–1 TP and 4.8 mg-l–1 TN over 3h to 5h. The effluent was collected in 150L containers. Average TP retention in the vegetated loam mesocosms was over 90%, compared to 75% in non-vegetated (barren) mesocosms. TP retention in the sand was very high (average 90%), regardless of treatment. TN retention increased to 80% in the vegetated loam mesocosms from 43% in barren loam mesocosms. TN retention in the sand was less overall, with retention increasing to 41% in the vegetated loam mesocosms from 26% in barren mesocosms. Increasing retention time in the sand mesocosms increased retention of nitrogen to 61%, a nearly 50% increase in retention performance. Nutrient retention persisted even under very high nutrient loads. While the loam is a less effective media by itself, the presence of vegetation substantially improves TP and TN retention. TN retention performance is improved by increasing retention time.
A Study of Nutrient Retention Dynamics in Vegetated and Non-Vegetated Bioretention Mesocosms
Bioretention systems are stormwater treatment devices installed to remove both dissolved and particulate pollutants. As stormwater percolates through the bioretention system, dissolved pollutants are removed from solution by chemical and biological processes. In our study, 20 bioretention mesocosms (10 with loamy sand and 10 with sandy loam, half with and half without vegetation) were used to investigate hydraulic behavior and dissolved nutrient retention. The mesocosms were dosed with 120L to 160L synthetic stormwater comprising 0.8 mg-l–1 TP and 4.8 mg-l–1 TN over 3h to 5h. The effluent was collected in 150L containers. Average TP retention in the vegetated loam mesocosms was over 90%, compared to 75% in non-vegetated (barren) mesocosms. TP retention in the sand was very high (average 90%), regardless of treatment. TN retention increased to 80% in the vegetated loam mesocosms from 43% in barren loam mesocosms. TN retention in the sand was less overall, with retention increasing to 41% in the vegetated loam mesocosms from 26% in barren mesocosms. Increasing retention time in the sand mesocosms increased retention of nitrogen to 61%, a nearly 50% increase in retention performance. Nutrient retention persisted even under very high nutrient loads. While the loam is a less effective media by itself, the presence of vegetation substantially improves TP and TN retention. TN retention performance is improved by increasing retention time.
A Study of Nutrient Retention Dynamics in Vegetated and Non-Vegetated Bioretention Mesocosms
Lucas, William C. (author) / Greenway, Margaret (author)
Second National Low Impact Development Conference ; 2007 ; Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Low Impact Development ; 140-158
2008-11-07
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
Nutrient Retention in Vegetated and Nonvegetated Bioretention Mesocosms
British Library Online Contents | 2008
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|Nutrient Retention in Mature Vegetated Bioretention Systems under Elevated Nutrient Loads
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|Nitrogen Retention in Bioretention Mesocosms with Outlet Controls
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010
|