A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Modeling Storm Sewer Networks and Urban Flooding in Roanoke, Virginia, with SWMM and GSSHA
Modeling urban flooding is challenging because of complex spatial variations and interactions between precipitation, land cover, and drainage networks. This paper presents a case study of the development of two hydrology and hydraulics models—the semidistributed storm water management model (SWMM) and the fully distributed gridded surface/subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) model—to simulate the hydrologic response of two neighboring urban watersheds with large storm sewer networks in the city of Roanoke, Virginia. Both models were calibrated and validated for the two watersheds based on nine events (May–October 2018), and the models were assessed on their ability to replicate measured stream discharge and storm sewer flow depths. The findings from the study indicate that both models reasonably capture the observed hydrologic responses but that each model offers unique benefits. Overall, SWMM’s value to the city is its ability to provide detailed information regarding the hydraulic conditions within the city’s storm sewer network, whereas GSSHA’s value to the city is its ability to predict the duration and spatial extent of flooding in two dimensions.
Modeling Storm Sewer Networks and Urban Flooding in Roanoke, Virginia, with SWMM and GSSHA
Modeling urban flooding is challenging because of complex spatial variations and interactions between precipitation, land cover, and drainage networks. This paper presents a case study of the development of two hydrology and hydraulics models—the semidistributed storm water management model (SWMM) and the fully distributed gridded surface/subsurface hydrologic analysis (GSSHA) model—to simulate the hydrologic response of two neighboring urban watersheds with large storm sewer networks in the city of Roanoke, Virginia. Both models were calibrated and validated for the two watersheds based on nine events (May–October 2018), and the models were assessed on their ability to replicate measured stream discharge and storm sewer flow depths. The findings from the study indicate that both models reasonably capture the observed hydrologic responses but that each model offers unique benefits. Overall, SWMM’s value to the city is its ability to provide detailed information regarding the hydraulic conditions within the city’s storm sewer network, whereas GSSHA’s value to the city is its ability to predict the duration and spatial extent of flooding in two dimensions.
Modeling Storm Sewer Networks and Urban Flooding in Roanoke, Virginia, with SWMM and GSSHA
Brendel, Conrad E. (author) / Dymond, Randel L. (author) / Aguilar, Marcus F. (author)
2020-10-30
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Modeling Highway Stormwater Runoff and Groundwater Table Variations with SWMM and GSSHA
| Online Contents | 2017
Incorporating Storm Sewer Exfiltration into SWMM: Proof of Concept
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010
Using SWMM in Urban Storm Water Master Planning
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
Irrigating Urban Agriculture with Harvested Rainwater: Case Study in Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| Springer Verlag | 2016