A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Discussion on Superposition Empirical Formula of Ultimate Bearing Capacity Based on the Upper Bound Limit Analysis Theory
Traditional Terzaghi foundation bearing capacity superposition empirical formula does not consider the nonlinear effect of the soil unit weight on the ultimate bearing capacity and its failure mode, which is only a kind of approximate method. Therefore, error occurs when unit weight is taken into account. The relatively complete, two-dimensional conversion velocity field based on slip-line field and the basic method and principle of corresponding failure mechanism were introduced in this paper. Compared with the existing upper bound failure mechanism, this failure mechanism adds a one-dimensional optimization freedom degree, which can reflect the real failure mode, and thus obtain better upper bound solutions. The results indicate that the traditional superposition empirical formula stress on safety, and the error caused by traditional superposition method will increase with the increase of the internal friction angle. The failure range derived from non-superposition method is between the failure range determined by using superposition method to solve the analysis coefficient Nγ and Nc (or Nq), which reflects the influence of soil unit weight on the failure mechanism.
Discussion on Superposition Empirical Formula of Ultimate Bearing Capacity Based on the Upper Bound Limit Analysis Theory
Traditional Terzaghi foundation bearing capacity superposition empirical formula does not consider the nonlinear effect of the soil unit weight on the ultimate bearing capacity and its failure mode, which is only a kind of approximate method. Therefore, error occurs when unit weight is taken into account. The relatively complete, two-dimensional conversion velocity field based on slip-line field and the basic method and principle of corresponding failure mechanism were introduced in this paper. Compared with the existing upper bound failure mechanism, this failure mechanism adds a one-dimensional optimization freedom degree, which can reflect the real failure mode, and thus obtain better upper bound solutions. The results indicate that the traditional superposition empirical formula stress on safety, and the error caused by traditional superposition method will increase with the increase of the internal friction angle. The failure range derived from non-superposition method is between the failure range determined by using superposition method to solve the analysis coefficient Nγ and Nc (or Nq), which reflects the influence of soil unit weight on the failure mechanism.
Discussion on Superposition Empirical Formula of Ultimate Bearing Capacity Based on the Upper Bound Limit Analysis Theory
Zhao, Lianheng (author) / Yang, Feng (author) / Huang, Fu (author) / Len, Wuming (author)
Second International Conference on Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering ; 2013 ; Chengdu, China
IACGE 2013 ; 462-470
2013-10-09
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2013
Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Strip Footing on Reinforced Embankment Using Upper Bound Limit Analysis
| Springer Verlag | 2021
Upper Bound Solution for Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Foundation Based on Unified Strength Theory
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012