A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Local Calibration of MEPDG for Flexible Pavements in New Mexico
Local calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) is performed by determining the pavement-performance model coefficients to minimize the difference between the measured and predicted distresses of New Mexico department of transportation (NMDOT) pavements. A total of 24 New Mexico pavement sections, which have all the MEPDG inputs and quantitative-distress values required for MEPDG calibration, were used for calibration. Pavement-performance models such as rutting, alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking, and roughness models were calibrated by an error-minimization algorithm. In the calibration methodology, the target was fixed to reduce the sum of squared errors, defined by the square of the difference between predicted and measured distress, so that any bias was eliminated and precision was increased. The optimized calibration coefficients are: , , , , and for the rutting model; , , and for alligator cracking; , , and for longitudinal cracking; and site factor = 0.015 for roughness. The results show that these calibration coefficients reduce error in the MEPDG prediction and assist better design of flexible pavements using MEPDG in New Mexico.
Local Calibration of MEPDG for Flexible Pavements in New Mexico
Local calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) is performed by determining the pavement-performance model coefficients to minimize the difference between the measured and predicted distresses of New Mexico department of transportation (NMDOT) pavements. A total of 24 New Mexico pavement sections, which have all the MEPDG inputs and quantitative-distress values required for MEPDG calibration, were used for calibration. Pavement-performance models such as rutting, alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking, and roughness models were calibrated by an error-minimization algorithm. In the calibration methodology, the target was fixed to reduce the sum of squared errors, defined by the square of the difference between predicted and measured distress, so that any bias was eliminated and precision was increased. The optimized calibration coefficients are: , , , , and for the rutting model; , , and for alligator cracking; , , and for longitudinal cracking; and site factor = 0.015 for roughness. The results show that these calibration coefficients reduce error in the MEPDG prediction and assist better design of flexible pavements using MEPDG in New Mexico.
Local Calibration of MEPDG for Flexible Pavements in New Mexico
Tarefder, Rafiqul (author) / Rodriguez-Ruiz, Jose I. (author)
Journal of Transportation Engineering ; 139 ; 981-991
2013-05-16
112013-01-01 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Local Calibration of MEPDG for Flexible Pavements in New Mexico
Online Contents | 2013
|Local Calibration of MEPDG for Flexible Pavements in New Mexico
Online Contents | 2013
|Local Calibration of the MEPDG for HMA Pavements in Missouri
Online Contents | 2008
|