A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Predicting Strand Transfer Length in Pretensioned Concrete: Eurocode versus North American Practice
Prestressing strands are commonly used in pretensioned prestressed concrete bridge construction. Transfer length is an important parameter for structural design. This paper presents a comparative study on strand transfer length provisions from Eurocode 2 and North American practice, and identifies similarities and differences between both models. A database of measured transfer lengths according to several authors has been compiled and compared with predictions according to code provisions. The intervals of predictions are smaller than those corresponding to the experimental results, and they are smaller when code provisions are more simplified. The interval from Eurocode 2 is greater than that from American Concrete Institute (ACI) code 318, which, in turn, is greater than the interval from AASHTO. The number of underestimated cases is lower for Eurocode 2 because of the higher predicted values, but situations in which a short transfer length is unfavorable are neglected by all models because they are not good predictions of shorter measured transfer lengths. When a transfer length estimation criterion is based on an allowable free end slip, more cases are excluded from the ACI code 318 provisions.
Predicting Strand Transfer Length in Pretensioned Concrete: Eurocode versus North American Practice
Prestressing strands are commonly used in pretensioned prestressed concrete bridge construction. Transfer length is an important parameter for structural design. This paper presents a comparative study on strand transfer length provisions from Eurocode 2 and North American practice, and identifies similarities and differences between both models. A database of measured transfer lengths according to several authors has been compiled and compared with predictions according to code provisions. The intervals of predictions are smaller than those corresponding to the experimental results, and they are smaller when code provisions are more simplified. The interval from Eurocode 2 is greater than that from American Concrete Institute (ACI) code 318, which, in turn, is greater than the interval from AASHTO. The number of underestimated cases is lower for Eurocode 2 because of the higher predicted values, but situations in which a short transfer length is unfavorable are neglected by all models because they are not good predictions of shorter measured transfer lengths. When a transfer length estimation criterion is based on an allowable free end slip, more cases are excluded from the ACI code 318 provisions.
Predicting Strand Transfer Length in Pretensioned Concrete: Eurocode versus North American Practice
Martí-Vargas, José R. (author) / Hale, W. Micah (author)
Journal of Bridge Engineering ; 18 ; 1270-1280
2013-05-14
112013-01-01 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Predicting Strand Transfer Length in Pretensioned Concrete: Eurocode versus North American Practice
| Online Contents | 2013
Predicting Strand Transfer Length in Pretensioned Concrete: Eurocode versus North American Practice
| British Library Online Contents | 2013
Methodological Aspects in Measurement of Strand Transfer Length in Pretensioned Concrete.
| Online Contents | 2013
Methodological Aspects in Measurement of Strand Transfer Length in Pretensioned Concrete
| Online Contents | 2012
Transfer length of FRP tendons in pretensioned concrete beams
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001