A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Competitive Dialogue in Norwegian Public Infrastructure Projects
Competitive dialogue (CD) is a relatively new procurement procedure introduced in 2004 by the European Parliament for particularly complex contracts. The Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA) has limited experience with the procedure, but they are planning to use it in several future projects. Limited research was found concerning the practical issues of CD. This paper explores the experiences of Norwegian practitioners to identify such issues and suggests measures for the success of future projects using the procedure. In addition to a literature study, a document study and 22 semistructured in-depth interviews with key informants from six cases selected from the Norwegian public infrastructure projects were carried out. Both the client and the suppliers value the potential of CD. However, several challenges were identified, such as lack of practical experience with CD, ethical challenges, determining the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) criteria, evaluation based on the MEAT criteria, and varying market interest. This paper contributes to construction engineering and management practice to increase the understanding of CD by suggesting what kinds of measures ought to be taken for the success of future projects using the procedure.
Competitive Dialogue in Norwegian Public Infrastructure Projects
Competitive dialogue (CD) is a relatively new procurement procedure introduced in 2004 by the European Parliament for particularly complex contracts. The Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA) has limited experience with the procedure, but they are planning to use it in several future projects. Limited research was found concerning the practical issues of CD. This paper explores the experiences of Norwegian practitioners to identify such issues and suggests measures for the success of future projects using the procedure. In addition to a literature study, a document study and 22 semistructured in-depth interviews with key informants from six cases selected from the Norwegian public infrastructure projects were carried out. Both the client and the suppliers value the potential of CD. However, several challenges were identified, such as lack of practical experience with CD, ethical challenges, determining the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) criteria, evaluation based on the MEAT criteria, and varying market interest. This paper contributes to construction engineering and management practice to increase the understanding of CD by suggesting what kinds of measures ought to be taken for the success of future projects using the procedure.
Competitive Dialogue in Norwegian Public Infrastructure Projects
Wondimu, Paulos Abebe (author) / Lohne, Jardar (author) / Lædre, Ola (author)
2018-07-27
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Resolution of Disputes in Infrastructure Projects: A Norwegian Perspective
| DOAJ | 2024
| British Library Online Contents | 2007
Rethinking public participation in infrastructure projects
| Online Contents | 2012
Construction and maintenance of public infrastructure projects
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODS FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
| TIBKAT | 2020