A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The Right to Terminate for Convenience Has Its Limits
The recent court case of De Avila v. Espinoza Metal Building & Roofing Contractors addressed the contract doctrines of interference, frustration of purpose, and termination in a dispute between a general contractor and a subcontractor.
The Right to Terminate for Convenience Has Its Limits
The recent court case of De Avila v. Espinoza Metal Building & Roofing Contractors addressed the contract doctrines of interference, frustration of purpose, and termination in a dispute between a general contractor and a subcontractor.
The Right to Terminate for Convenience Has Its Limits
Loulakis, Michael C. (author) / McLaughlin, Lauren P. (author)
Civil Engineering Magazine Archive ; 89 ; 12-13
2020-01-01
22019-01-01 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Is Owner’s Right to Terminate For Convenience Absolute?
| ASCE | 2016
The architect's right to terminate
Online Contents | 1993
Huntsman and Hexion terminate merger
British Library Online Contents | 2009