A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Protection of Embankments During Drilling and Grouting
According to the USACE National Inventory of Dams, there are nearly 84,000 dams in the United States. More than 30% of these are Significant or High Hazard, and nearly 50% are more than 50 years old. The USACE estimates that the total cost for needed dam repairs in the US exceeds $50 Billion, with $16 Billion needed for high hazard dams. More than 83% of the dams in the US are earthen embankments. One of the most serious and unacceptable performance problems for embankment dams is excessive seepage. An earthen dam with seepage problems will most likely have experienced some type of damage to the embankment or soil rock interface. Rehabilitating dams with seepage deficiencies often requires drilling through the dam and into the rock foundation for the purpose of constructing a grouted cutoff. Grouting of a rock foundation requires that multiple items of equipment be tripped in and out of a hole multiple times. For this reason, it is common that a hole is cased through the embankment with standpipe and the overburden drill tooling removed. Creating penetrations through an earthen dam and into the foundation has the potential to create hydraulic interconnections that did not exist previously and can result in dam safety concerns. Given that the casings remain in place, proper sealing of the casing annulus is crucial to the long term integrity of the dam. Grouting operations result in significant hydraulic pressures being applied and the sequence of grouting operations and predominant orientation of the rock joints must also be considered to maximize the protection afforded to the embankment. The authors have been involved in the construction of a majority of the USACE Major Dam Rehabilitations in the last decade where grouting was performed in response to seepage. As part of these projects, more than 500,000 lineal feet of standpipe through overburden was installed in water retaining embankments. This paper reviews the methods employed for drilling through the embankment, the casing material utilized, means and methods utilized to grout the casing in place, interface treatment protocols, and sequence of grouting operations. Observed defects or issues are identified and the pros and cons of the methods specified or used are evaluated. Recommended means and methods for future projects are presented.
Protection of Embankments During Drilling and Grouting
According to the USACE National Inventory of Dams, there are nearly 84,000 dams in the United States. More than 30% of these are Significant or High Hazard, and nearly 50% are more than 50 years old. The USACE estimates that the total cost for needed dam repairs in the US exceeds $50 Billion, with $16 Billion needed for high hazard dams. More than 83% of the dams in the US are earthen embankments. One of the most serious and unacceptable performance problems for embankment dams is excessive seepage. An earthen dam with seepage problems will most likely have experienced some type of damage to the embankment or soil rock interface. Rehabilitating dams with seepage deficiencies often requires drilling through the dam and into the rock foundation for the purpose of constructing a grouted cutoff. Grouting of a rock foundation requires that multiple items of equipment be tripped in and out of a hole multiple times. For this reason, it is common that a hole is cased through the embankment with standpipe and the overburden drill tooling removed. Creating penetrations through an earthen dam and into the foundation has the potential to create hydraulic interconnections that did not exist previously and can result in dam safety concerns. Given that the casings remain in place, proper sealing of the casing annulus is crucial to the long term integrity of the dam. Grouting operations result in significant hydraulic pressures being applied and the sequence of grouting operations and predominant orientation of the rock joints must also be considered to maximize the protection afforded to the embankment. The authors have been involved in the construction of a majority of the USACE Major Dam Rehabilitations in the last decade where grouting was performed in response to seepage. As part of these projects, more than 500,000 lineal feet of standpipe through overburden was installed in water retaining embankments. This paper reviews the methods employed for drilling through the embankment, the casing material utilized, means and methods utilized to grout the casing in place, interface treatment protocols, and sequence of grouting operations. Observed defects or issues are identified and the pros and cons of the methods specified or used are evaluated. Recommended means and methods for future projects are presented.
Protection of Embankments During Drilling and Grouting
Stare, Daniel P. (author) / Hockenberry, Adam N. (author) / Dreese, Trent L. (author) / Wilson, David B. (author) / Bruce, Donald A. (author)
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Grouting and Deep Mixing ; 2012 ; New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Grouting and Deep Mixing 2012 ; 1304-1313
2012-08-17
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
Dams , Grouting , Highways and roads , Chemical grouting , United States , Anchors , Cement , Drilling , Cutoffs , Piles , Mixing , Embankments , Foundations , Hydraulic structures
Protection of Embankments during Drilling and Grouting
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012
Consolidation of embankments by cement grouting
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1931
Inspection of three railway embankments stabilised by grouting
Engineering Index Backfile | 1954
Drilling through Embankments: The State of Practice
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
Grouting of embankments at Cathaleen's Fall generating station on the river Erne
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000