A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Deep Foundation Analysis from Cone Penetrometers–A Reappraisal
Geoengineering profession has witnessed continuous advancement in the application of cone penetrometer test (CPT) data for the analysis of deep foundations. Numerous methods based on scaling systems between CPT data and the pile capacity have been advanced. Rational methods founded on the CPT-based estimates of geoengineering parameters are also available for use in various analytical formulations. There are areas still demanding significant refinement. Diverse data sets of pile load tests and CPTs have played a key role in implementing this approach. The applicability of each method is limited for soil and pile typology. Pile capacity is not an agreed single value also. Each method requires one of the numerous criteria to define capacity value on the pile load-displacement curves. For most part, the manner in which CPT-based pile designs were advanced shows a certain degree of randomness. Furthermore, CPT readings are recorded in short-term at a high strain rate of loading. This differs significantly from the pile resistance in long-term involving setup or increased capacity overtime. This important yet missing component in pile-CPT correlations leads to uneconomical designs. These and other related issues are discussed in detail, and recommendations are made to steer future research on the topic.
Deep Foundation Analysis from Cone Penetrometers–A Reappraisal
Geoengineering profession has witnessed continuous advancement in the application of cone penetrometer test (CPT) data for the analysis of deep foundations. Numerous methods based on scaling systems between CPT data and the pile capacity have been advanced. Rational methods founded on the CPT-based estimates of geoengineering parameters are also available for use in various analytical formulations. There are areas still demanding significant refinement. Diverse data sets of pile load tests and CPTs have played a key role in implementing this approach. The applicability of each method is limited for soil and pile typology. Pile capacity is not an agreed single value also. Each method requires one of the numerous criteria to define capacity value on the pile load-displacement curves. For most part, the manner in which CPT-based pile designs were advanced shows a certain degree of randomness. Furthermore, CPT readings are recorded in short-term at a high strain rate of loading. This differs significantly from the pile resistance in long-term involving setup or increased capacity overtime. This important yet missing component in pile-CPT correlations leads to uneconomical designs. These and other related issues are discussed in detail, and recommendations are made to steer future research on the topic.
Deep Foundation Analysis from Cone Penetrometers–A Reappraisal
Niazi, Fawad S. (author) / Mayne, Paul W. (author)
IFCEE 2018 ; 2018 ; Orlando, Florida
IFCEE 2018 ; 53-62
2018-06-06
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
Deep Foundation Analysis from Cone Penetrometers—A Reappraisal
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2018
|Radio-isotope cone penetrometers and the assessment of foundation improvement
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
|Assessment of ground improvement work using radioisotope cone penetrometers
British Library Online Contents | 2007
|Application of RI-cone penetrometers in sandy foundations
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|Performance of RI cone penetrometers in sand deposits
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|