A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Building Energy Use Modes and Thermal Comfort
Improving the energy efficiency of residential and office buildings is an important way of reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions and eliminating their associated adverse environmental impacts. On the other hand, people spend the majority of their times in buildings and demand comfortable, healthy, and productive indoor environments. Building energy conservation and occupant comfort are usually considered to be conflicting objectives. Towards exploring ways of reducing building energy consumption without sacrifice in thermal comfort, this paper aims to study the relationship between energy use mode, thermal comfort, and energy consumption in office buildings. To conduct an initial experimental study, a floor of an office building in Philadelphia, PA, was instrumented and monitored. Cooling energy consumption, indoor temperature, occupant feedback on thermal comfort, and outdoor temperature data were collected for three months. A clustering algorithm was used to identify three energy use modes: saver, balanced, and spender. The correlation between building operation efficiency and thermal comfort was investigated, and thermal comfort levels under different energy use modes were compared. The results show that there is a very weak correlation between building operation efficiency and thermal comfort, and that there is not a significant difference in thermal comfort across the three energy use modes. The findings of this study may help in identifying building operation strategies that reduce energy consumption while remaining thermally comfortable.
Building Energy Use Modes and Thermal Comfort
Improving the energy efficiency of residential and office buildings is an important way of reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions and eliminating their associated adverse environmental impacts. On the other hand, people spend the majority of their times in buildings and demand comfortable, healthy, and productive indoor environments. Building energy conservation and occupant comfort are usually considered to be conflicting objectives. Towards exploring ways of reducing building energy consumption without sacrifice in thermal comfort, this paper aims to study the relationship between energy use mode, thermal comfort, and energy consumption in office buildings. To conduct an initial experimental study, a floor of an office building in Philadelphia, PA, was instrumented and monitored. Cooling energy consumption, indoor temperature, occupant feedback on thermal comfort, and outdoor temperature data were collected for three months. A clustering algorithm was used to identify three energy use modes: saver, balanced, and spender. The correlation between building operation efficiency and thermal comfort was investigated, and thermal comfort levels under different energy use modes were compared. The results show that there is a very weak correlation between building operation efficiency and thermal comfort, and that there is not a significant difference in thermal comfort across the three energy use modes. The findings of this study may help in identifying building operation strategies that reduce energy consumption while remaining thermally comfortable.
Building Energy Use Modes and Thermal Comfort
Amasyali, Kadir (author) / El-Gohary, Nora (author)
ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering 2017 ; 2017 ; Seattle, Washington
Computing in Civil Engineering 2017 ; 350-358
2017-06-22
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
Building Energy Use Modes and Thermal Comfort
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2017
|Effect of variable ventilation modes on indoor thermal comfort and building energy consumption
Oxford University Press | 2012
|Building Energy Performance and Thermal Comfort in Singapore
British Library Online Contents | 1993
|Thermal comfort in residential buildings: Comfort values and scales for building energy simulation
BASE | 2009
|Building energy efficiency and thermal comfort in tropical climates
Elsevier | 2005
|