A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Sandy Soils Subjected to Vertical Cyclic Loads
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9137-0384
The stone column encasement is a widespread ground improvement technique that effectively improves the engineering characteristics of weak and compressible soils with excessive settlement problems under vertical loadings. Despite the extensive use of stone columns, the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with various geosynthetic encasement configurations under cyclic loading conditions remains unexplored. This study aimed to understand the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with dual-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (DLGESCs), single-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (SLGESCs), and ordinary stone columns (OSCs) under cyclic loading conditions. The effects of cyclic loading amplitude, frequency, and geosynthetic encasement on settlement behavior were investigated using PLAXIS-3D (version 21) software with the hardening soil small constitutive model, and geosynthetic encasements with variable axial stiffness and tensile strength were studied. The study results indicated that higher cyclic loading amplitudes and frequencies increase the settlement of the stone column. DLGESC outperformed SLGESC with a 5.8%–11.2% settlement reduction, while SLGESC reduced settlement by 40.9%–47.8% compared to OSC. Geosynthetic GT3 (800 kN/m axial stiffness, 70 kN/m tensile strength) decreased settlement by 7.6%–13.6% compared to GT1. This research emphasizes ground improvement techniques and demonstrates the way DLGESC reduces settlement and improves structure stability on stone column–reinforced sandy soils. This study can help design resilient and stable foundations for pavements, railroad tracks, and offshore structures under cyclic vertical loading characteristics and suitable encasement configurations.
Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Sandy Soils Subjected to Vertical Cyclic Loads
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9137-0384
The stone column encasement is a widespread ground improvement technique that effectively improves the engineering characteristics of weak and compressible soils with excessive settlement problems under vertical loadings. Despite the extensive use of stone columns, the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with various geosynthetic encasement configurations under cyclic loading conditions remains unexplored. This study aimed to understand the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with dual-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (DLGESCs), single-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (SLGESCs), and ordinary stone columns (OSCs) under cyclic loading conditions. The effects of cyclic loading amplitude, frequency, and geosynthetic encasement on settlement behavior were investigated using PLAXIS-3D (version 21) software with the hardening soil small constitutive model, and geosynthetic encasements with variable axial stiffness and tensile strength were studied. The study results indicated that higher cyclic loading amplitudes and frequencies increase the settlement of the stone column. DLGESC outperformed SLGESC with a 5.8%–11.2% settlement reduction, while SLGESC reduced settlement by 40.9%–47.8% compared to OSC. Geosynthetic GT3 (800 kN/m axial stiffness, 70 kN/m tensile strength) decreased settlement by 7.6%–13.6% compared to GT1. This research emphasizes ground improvement techniques and demonstrates the way DLGESC reduces settlement and improves structure stability on stone column–reinforced sandy soils. This study can help design resilient and stable foundations for pavements, railroad tracks, and offshore structures under cyclic vertical loading characteristics and suitable encasement configurations.
Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Sandy Soils Subjected to Vertical Cyclic Loads
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9137-0384
The stone column encasement is a widespread ground improvement technique that effectively improves the engineering characteristics of weak and compressible soils with excessive settlement problems under vertical loadings. Despite the extensive use of stone columns, the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with various geosynthetic encasement configurations under cyclic loading conditions remains unexplored. This study aimed to understand the settlement response of sandy soils reinforced with dual-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (DLGESCs), single-layer geosynthetic-encased stone columns (SLGESCs), and ordinary stone columns (OSCs) under cyclic loading conditions. The effects of cyclic loading amplitude, frequency, and geosynthetic encasement on settlement behavior were investigated using PLAXIS-3D (version 21) software with the hardening soil small constitutive model, and geosynthetic encasements with variable axial stiffness and tensile strength were studied. The study results indicated that higher cyclic loading amplitudes and frequencies increase the settlement of the stone column. DLGESC outperformed SLGESC with a 5.8%–11.2% settlement reduction, while SLGESC reduced settlement by 40.9%–47.8% compared to OSC. Geosynthetic GT3 (800 kN/m axial stiffness, 70 kN/m tensile strength) decreased settlement by 7.6%–13.6% compared to GT1. This research emphasizes ground improvement techniques and demonstrates the way DLGESC reduces settlement and improves structure stability on stone column–reinforced sandy soils. This study can help design resilient and stable foundations for pavements, railroad tracks, and offshore structures under cyclic vertical loading characteristics and suitable encasement configurations.
Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Sandy Soils Subjected to Vertical Cyclic Loads
Int. J. Geomech.
Kumar, Neeraj (author) / Kumar, Rakesh (author)
2025-01-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Geosynthetic-Encased Granular Columns Subjected to Vertical and Shear Loads
| Springer Verlag | 2021
Seismic Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns
| British Library Online Contents | 2014
Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation
| Elsevier | 2006
Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation
| Tema Archive | 2006
Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation
| Online Contents | 2006