A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Characterization and Comparison of Aerodynamic Roughness Lengths Using Ground-Based Photography and Sonic Anemometry
In this study, two methods used to estimate surface terrain conditions () surrounding Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) stations in tropical cyclone-prone regions were analyzed. The first method utilized ground-based photography from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hurricane Research Division’s Tropical Cyclone Wind Exposure Documentation Project (WEDP). The second applied a modified effective method using ASOS wind data. Comparisons reveal that WEDP estimates are typically larger in magnitude and do not account for changes in upstream . Variability in the estimates showed a distinctly skewed nature in the probability distributions, which may have some physical meaning. It was also shown that standardized maximum 1-min sustained wind speeds using both the WEDP and MM2010 median estimates for short fetch lengths can have differences as large as 15%. The MM2010 estimates were also compared with single weighted mean estimates to be incorporated in the next version of the U.S. wind loading standard and suggest that a single weighted mean value does not effectively capture the variability of the terrain with respect to wind direction.
Characterization and Comparison of Aerodynamic Roughness Lengths Using Ground-Based Photography and Sonic Anemometry
In this study, two methods used to estimate surface terrain conditions () surrounding Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) stations in tropical cyclone-prone regions were analyzed. The first method utilized ground-based photography from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hurricane Research Division’s Tropical Cyclone Wind Exposure Documentation Project (WEDP). The second applied a modified effective method using ASOS wind data. Comparisons reveal that WEDP estimates are typically larger in magnitude and do not account for changes in upstream . Variability in the estimates showed a distinctly skewed nature in the probability distributions, which may have some physical meaning. It was also shown that standardized maximum 1-min sustained wind speeds using both the WEDP and MM2010 median estimates for short fetch lengths can have differences as large as 15%. The MM2010 estimates were also compared with single weighted mean estimates to be incorporated in the next version of the U.S. wind loading standard and suggest that a single weighted mean value does not effectively capture the variability of the terrain with respect to wind direction.
Characterization and Comparison of Aerodynamic Roughness Lengths Using Ground-Based Photography and Sonic Anemometry
Lombardo, Franklin T. (author) / Krupar, Richard J. (author)
2017-03-03
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Estimating Equivalent Roughness Lengths Based on Wake Sizes
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009
|Laser Doppler anemometry and conditional sampling
Online Contents
|Extreme velocities near building faces using Doppler anemometry
Online Contents | 1994
|