A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparison of Predicted and Actual Loads on Piles Using a Combined Analysis Model
After construction was completed in 2005, it was noticed that the central pier of bridge 815 presented differential settlements of about 2 to 2.5 inches between the North and South edges of the pier footing. The resulting deck deformations and potential for foundation failure required a stability assessment and an underpinning solution to reestablish the bridge deck cross slope. A geotechnical investigation that included borings through the existing seven foot thick footing was completed. A geotechnical three dimensional model of the pier foundation was developed using a finite element computer program. This Combined Analysis model developed for the project allowed to perform all calculations following the LRFD design considerations and to include the contribution of the existing spread footing in the final underpinning solution. The model also allowed determining the design capacity required by the micropiles. The design solution, which considered locating the micropiles within the existing footing footprint, reduced the impact of the repair on the normal functioning of the road and reduced the number of piles required. The recommended solution has been constructed and four of the micropiles have been instrumented and then monitored for a period of 20 months. A comparison of the loads predicted by the design model and the actual loads on the piles is presented. The results validate the application of the Combined Analysis model for bridge foundation design.
Comparison of Predicted and Actual Loads on Piles Using a Combined Analysis Model
After construction was completed in 2005, it was noticed that the central pier of bridge 815 presented differential settlements of about 2 to 2.5 inches between the North and South edges of the pier footing. The resulting deck deformations and potential for foundation failure required a stability assessment and an underpinning solution to reestablish the bridge deck cross slope. A geotechnical investigation that included borings through the existing seven foot thick footing was completed. A geotechnical three dimensional model of the pier foundation was developed using a finite element computer program. This Combined Analysis model developed for the project allowed to perform all calculations following the LRFD design considerations and to include the contribution of the existing spread footing in the final underpinning solution. The model also allowed determining the design capacity required by the micropiles. The design solution, which considered locating the micropiles within the existing footing footprint, reduced the impact of the repair on the normal functioning of the road and reduced the number of piles required. The recommended solution has been constructed and four of the micropiles have been instrumented and then monitored for a period of 20 months. A comparison of the loads predicted by the design model and the actual loads on the piles is presented. The results validate the application of the Combined Analysis model for bridge foundation design.
Comparison of Predicted and Actual Loads on Piles Using a Combined Analysis Model
Horta, Evelio (author) / McGillivray, Ross (author)
GeoCongress 2012 ; 2012 ; Oakland, California, United States
GeoCongress 2012 ; 255-264
2012-03-29
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
Comparison of Predicted and Actual Loads on Piles Using a Combined Analysis Model
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012
Theoretical and Actual Bearing Capacity of Driven Piles Using Model Piles in Sand
| Trans Tech Publications | 2015
Theoretical and Actual Bearing Capacity of Driven Piles Using Model Piles in Sand
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2015
Analytical Solution for Piles Supporting Combined Lateral Loads
| British Library Online Contents | 2006
A Comparison Between Actual and Predicted Evacuation Times
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998