A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Case Study: Construction and In Situ Hydraulic Conductivity Evaluation of a Deep Soil-Cement-Bentonite Cutoff Wall
This paper presents a case study of a deep soil-cement-bentonite (SCB) slurry trench cutoff wall constructed outside of Smithland, KY, in 2010. Installed to a maximum depth of 56 m, this cutoff wall is the deepest known seepage barrier installed using continuous trenching. The wall was installed around the perimeter of a deep excavation to reduce long-term dewatering costs associated with construction of a hydroelectric power plant adjacent to the Ohio River. After wall construction, a dewatering system was installed inside the area enclosed by the wall to facilitate the deep excavation. Preconstruction design and construction details are presented along with the results of a post-construction assessment of the hydraulic conductivity (k) of the wall. Steady-state groundwater flow measurements from the dewatering system coupled with information on the wall thickness and water levels inside and outside of the wall were used to obtain a large-scale estimate of the in situ k of the wall. The in situ k was compared with laboratory k values measured for specimens prepared from grab samples of the as-mixed SCB backfill. Comparisons also were made to the target (design)k and the expected field mixed backfill k established during a preconstruction bench-scale study. The comparisons revealed that the in situ k is approximately one order of magnitude less than the design k and approximately equal to the average laboratory k measured from grab samples and the expected k from the results of the bench-scale study.
Case Study: Construction and In Situ Hydraulic Conductivity Evaluation of a Deep Soil-Cement-Bentonite Cutoff Wall
This paper presents a case study of a deep soil-cement-bentonite (SCB) slurry trench cutoff wall constructed outside of Smithland, KY, in 2010. Installed to a maximum depth of 56 m, this cutoff wall is the deepest known seepage barrier installed using continuous trenching. The wall was installed around the perimeter of a deep excavation to reduce long-term dewatering costs associated with construction of a hydroelectric power plant adjacent to the Ohio River. After wall construction, a dewatering system was installed inside the area enclosed by the wall to facilitate the deep excavation. Preconstruction design and construction details are presented along with the results of a post-construction assessment of the hydraulic conductivity (k) of the wall. Steady-state groundwater flow measurements from the dewatering system coupled with information on the wall thickness and water levels inside and outside of the wall were used to obtain a large-scale estimate of the in situ k of the wall. The in situ k was compared with laboratory k values measured for specimens prepared from grab samples of the as-mixed SCB backfill. Comparisons also were made to the target (design)k and the expected field mixed backfill k established during a preconstruction bench-scale study. The comparisons revealed that the in situ k is approximately one order of magnitude less than the design k and approximately equal to the average laboratory k measured from grab samples and the expected k from the results of the bench-scale study.
Case Study: Construction and In Situ Hydraulic Conductivity Evaluation of a Deep Soil-Cement-Bentonite Cutoff Wall
Ruffing, D. G. (author) / Evans, J. C. (author)
Geo-Congress 2014 ; 2014 ; Atlanta, Georgia
Geo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers ; 1836-1848
2014-02-24
Conference paper
Electronic Resource
English
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2014
|Laboratory and In Situ Tests for Long-Term Hydraulic Conductivity of a Cement-Bentonite Cutoff Wall
British Library Online Contents | 2010
|Laboratory and In Situ Tests for Long-Term Hydraulic Conductivity of a Cement-Bentonite Cutoff Wall
Online Contents | 2010
|Assessment of Backfill Hydraulic Conductivity in an Instrumented Soil-Bentonite Cutoff Wall
Springer Verlag | 2018
|