A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Texas Court Reverses Jury Verdict by Enforcing No-Damage-for-Delay Clause
A state appeals court reversed a $19-million jury verdict, forcing a contractor not only to forgo its award but also to pay $11 million for the project owner’s attorney fees.
Texas Court Reverses Jury Verdict by Enforcing No-Damage-for-Delay Clause
A state appeals court reversed a $19-million jury verdict, forcing a contractor not only to forgo its award but also to pay $11 million for the project owner’s attorney fees.
Texas Court Reverses Jury Verdict by Enforcing No-Damage-for-Delay Clause
Loulakis, Michael C. (author) / McLaughlin, Lauren P. (author)
Civil Engineering Magazine Archive ; 82 ; 88
2016-01-01
12012-01-01 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Jury Verdict: Frequency versus Risk-Based Culvert Design
Online Contents | 1994
|Jury Verdict: Frequency versus Risk-Based Culvert Design: Closure
British Library Online Contents | 1994
|Comment - Jury Verdict: Frequency versus Risk-Based Culvert Design
Online Contents | 1995
|Jury Verdict: Frequency versus Risk-Based Culvert Design. Gary L. Lewis
British Library Online Contents | 1994
|