A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Neo‐Liberalism, Police, and the Governance of Little Urban Things
This article seeks to refine understandings of the governmental logics that comprise and shape urban governance. Drawing on research using ethnographic methods that explore the business improvement district (BID) and the condominium corporation (condo) it is argued that exclusive focus on urban neo-liberalism neglects an urban ”police.” This latter logic is most famously remarked upon in Michel Foucault’s writings as targeting “little things” in urban spaces. Both “police” and the ”free rider problem” it confronts predate and are irreducible to neo-liberalism. Ethnography helps discern this “police” as well as how neo-liberalism relates to it in private urban realms typically hidden from view. Examining BIDs and condos in this way shows that neo-liberalism and “police” co-exist and combine in the governance of urban residential and commercial life. This matters because it reveals a more complex picture of urban governance than is sometimes assumed when neo-liberalism is exclusively invoked and one that is necessarily considered when conceiving of alternative governing arrangements.
Neo‐Liberalism, Police, and the Governance of Little Urban Things
This article seeks to refine understandings of the governmental logics that comprise and shape urban governance. Drawing on research using ethnographic methods that explore the business improvement district (BID) and the condominium corporation (condo) it is argued that exclusive focus on urban neo-liberalism neglects an urban ”police.” This latter logic is most famously remarked upon in Michel Foucault’s writings as targeting “little things” in urban spaces. Both “police” and the ”free rider problem” it confronts predate and are irreducible to neo-liberalism. Ethnography helps discern this “police” as well as how neo-liberalism relates to it in private urban realms typically hidden from view. Examining BIDs and condos in this way shows that neo-liberalism and “police” co-exist and combine in the governance of urban residential and commercial life. This matters because it reveals a more complex picture of urban governance than is sometimes assumed when neo-liberalism is exclusively invoked and one that is necessarily considered when conceiving of alternative governing arrangements.
Neo‐Liberalism, Police, and the Governance of Little Urban Things
Lippert, Randy K. (author)
2014-10-17
doi:10.22439/fs.v0i18.4651
Foucault Studies; Number 18: October 2014: Ethnographies of Neoliberal Governmentalities; 49-65 ; 1832-5203
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
710
Urban governance and police expenditures
Elsevier | 1979
|Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-Theoretical Perspective
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|Online Contents | 2012
|Liberalism, marxism and urban and regional studies
Online Contents | 1995
|Police Misconduct, Community Opposition, and Urban Governance in New York City, 1945-1965
Online Contents | 2015
|