A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Innovation Districts: a rapid systematic review and synthesis of innovation district studies
Background: Innovation Districts are urban interventions designed to cluster key stakeholders and resources within a specific area to drive technological, creative, and scientific advancements. Although they are viewed as a tool for promoting sustainable growth and reducing spatial inequalities, empirical evidence on their real-world impact has largely not been synthesised.// Objective: This study aimed to map and synthesise empirical evidence on the economic and social impacts of Innovation Districts. Specifically, it sought to understand both short-term and long-term effects, including job creation, collaboration, and local community outcomes.// Methods: A rapid systematic review was conducted using mapping, narrative synthesis, and quantitative/qualitative approaches. Data from various geographical settings, particularly the US and Australia, were synthesized to evaluate Innovation Districts' impact on job creation and broader economic outcomes.// Components: The study reviewed 66 empirical studies and synthesised 55 of them. It focused on both short-term and long-term economic impacts, education initiatives, community engagement, and housing affordability within Innovation Districts. No UK studies on Innovation Districts were included.// Results: Innovation Districts have been effective in creating highly skilled jobs, particularly in research and development. However, they face challenges in fostering collaboration and integrating local communities. Long-term effects on job creation and housing pressures are less clear, although with some evidence indicating that Innovation Districts may exacerbate local inequalities.// Implications: While Innovation Districts show promise in economic terms, their social impacts are less understood. To prevent exacerbating inequalities, future Innovation Districts should have a greater emphasis on inclusive community engagement, equitable housing policies, and ensure that local residents benefit from the economic gains generated.
Innovation Districts: a rapid systematic review and synthesis of innovation district studies
Background: Innovation Districts are urban interventions designed to cluster key stakeholders and resources within a specific area to drive technological, creative, and scientific advancements. Although they are viewed as a tool for promoting sustainable growth and reducing spatial inequalities, empirical evidence on their real-world impact has largely not been synthesised.// Objective: This study aimed to map and synthesise empirical evidence on the economic and social impacts of Innovation Districts. Specifically, it sought to understand both short-term and long-term effects, including job creation, collaboration, and local community outcomes.// Methods: A rapid systematic review was conducted using mapping, narrative synthesis, and quantitative/qualitative approaches. Data from various geographical settings, particularly the US and Australia, were synthesized to evaluate Innovation Districts' impact on job creation and broader economic outcomes.// Components: The study reviewed 66 empirical studies and synthesised 55 of them. It focused on both short-term and long-term economic impacts, education initiatives, community engagement, and housing affordability within Innovation Districts. No UK studies on Innovation Districts were included.// Results: Innovation Districts have been effective in creating highly skilled jobs, particularly in research and development. However, they face challenges in fostering collaboration and integrating local communities. Long-term effects on job creation and housing pressures are less clear, although with some evidence indicating that Innovation Districts may exacerbate local inequalities.// Implications: While Innovation Districts show promise in economic terms, their social impacts are less understood. To prevent exacerbating inequalities, future Innovation Districts should have a greater emphasis on inclusive community engagement, equitable housing policies, and ensure that local residents benefit from the economic gains generated.
Innovation Districts: a rapid systematic review and synthesis of innovation district studies
Kneale, Dylan (author) / Vigurs, Carol (author) / Xu, Jie (author) / Marshall Kissoon, Katherine (author) / Mendizabal-Espinosa, Rosa (author) / Bangpan, Mukdarut (author)
2024-10-23
EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London: London, UK.
Paper
Electronic Resource
English
User-Centric Innovation District Planning: Lessons from Brisbane’s Leading Innovation Districts
| DOAJ | 2023
Industrial Districts, Innovation and I-district Effect: Territory or Industrial Specialization?
| Online Contents | 2010
Industrial Districts, Innovation and I-district Effect: Territory or Industrial Specialization?
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2010
Is Innovation Redesigning District Heating? A Systematic Literature Review
| DOAJ | 2021
Radical innovation in Marshallian industrial districts
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2018