A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Life cycle assessment of Georgia and Dunsmuir viaduct
This study sought to provide a baseline comparison point to the City of Vancouver for the construction of the Georgia and Dunsmuir viaducts, as well as an approximation of several of the end of life options that are possible. This is accomplished by doing a quantity takeoff of the viaducts using a combination of OnScreen Takeoff and Excel. The volumes developed from this were then modelled in Athena Impact Estimator in order to determine the net impact of the construction of the viaducts. In order to model the end of life options of the viaducts were considered; Greenway or Cut and Haul removal. Based on approximated models, Cut and Haul removal was found to have the lower environmental impact. The results should be considered preliminary due to the lack of information, LCA tools available and time constraints to complete a more detailed analysis. Further analysis is recommended to validate the material quantities and develop models of more detailed end of life scenarios. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.” ; Applied Science, Faculty of ; Civil Engineering, Department of ; Unreviewed ; Undergraduate
Life cycle assessment of Georgia and Dunsmuir viaduct
This study sought to provide a baseline comparison point to the City of Vancouver for the construction of the Georgia and Dunsmuir viaducts, as well as an approximation of several of the end of life options that are possible. This is accomplished by doing a quantity takeoff of the viaducts using a combination of OnScreen Takeoff and Excel. The volumes developed from this were then modelled in Athena Impact Estimator in order to determine the net impact of the construction of the viaducts. In order to model the end of life options of the viaducts were considered; Greenway or Cut and Haul removal. Based on approximated models, Cut and Haul removal was found to have the lower environmental impact. The results should be considered preliminary due to the lack of information, LCA tools available and time constraints to complete a more detailed analysis. Further analysis is recommended to validate the material quantities and develop models of more detailed end of life scenarios. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.” ; Applied Science, Faculty of ; Civil Engineering, Department of ; Unreviewed ; Undergraduate
Life cycle assessment of Georgia and Dunsmuir viaduct
Dennert, Katherine (author) / Plant, Sherwood (author) / University of British Columbia. Sustainability Office
2012-04-03
UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Student Report
Paper
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
The Georgia-Harris viaduct, Vancouver
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1913
Cable installation in Georgia Viaduct, Vancouver
Engineering Index Backfile | 1939
Environmental Assessment: Harney Street Viaduct
NTIS | 2012
Boyne Railway Viaduct - structural assessment
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000