A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
ESTIMATION OF RISKS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF NATURALLY TECHNOGENIC ENVIRONMENTS
The risks of development of such natural-tech environments as landfills of solid householdwaste, tailings dams, waste heaps at extraction of minerals for the possibility of their re-use as a basis of structuresfor civil and industrial construction are carried out in the work. The example of the Boryspil solid waste landfillhighlights the main indicators of sources of risk: human impact, risk of explosions and fires, respiratory response,sanitary-epidemic danger, effect on the atmospheric air, impact on the ground cover, accumulation of heavy metalson groundwater in the presence of systems for collecting and draining filtration water, deformation of the surface.The methodology of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis was used to expertly assess the risks of reuse of areasoccupied by natural and man-made environments for the construction of civilian and industrial sites. The expertswere asked to rank the action by paired comparisons. A pairwise comparison consisted in a consistent comparisonof each action with each other. The methodology assumes a risk rating based on the Risk priority number, which isa product of the rankings obtained by expertly assessing the severity of the consequences and the likelihood that anobject will not be detected, by the frequency of emergencies. First, the risks with the highest Risk priority numberare eliminated. Possible scenarios and combinations of risk spectrum scenarios (technical, environmental, social,economic) have been identified. These priorities were ranked in descending order (from 10 to 0): the highest scorewas assigned to the maximum value (the most dangerous) that was given effect. The results of the expert evaluationof the signs of severity and non-detection obtained from one expert are presented. We show matrices of related traitseverity and non-detection traits, compiled by all experts. 16 experts participated in our work. Based on the rankingof expert indicators, matrices for estimating the impact of sources of risk for the choice of remediation direction andsubsequent use of natural-tech environments were constructed. The result was used to quantify the risk presented bythe criticality matrix of this indicating system, a measure of its impact on its reliability.
ESTIMATION OF RISKS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF NATURALLY TECHNOGENIC ENVIRONMENTS
The risks of development of such natural-tech environments as landfills of solid householdwaste, tailings dams, waste heaps at extraction of minerals for the possibility of their re-use as a basis of structuresfor civil and industrial construction are carried out in the work. The example of the Boryspil solid waste landfillhighlights the main indicators of sources of risk: human impact, risk of explosions and fires, respiratory response,sanitary-epidemic danger, effect on the atmospheric air, impact on the ground cover, accumulation of heavy metalson groundwater in the presence of systems for collecting and draining filtration water, deformation of the surface.The methodology of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis was used to expertly assess the risks of reuse of areasoccupied by natural and man-made environments for the construction of civilian and industrial sites. The expertswere asked to rank the action by paired comparisons. A pairwise comparison consisted in a consistent comparisonof each action with each other. The methodology assumes a risk rating based on the Risk priority number, which isa product of the rankings obtained by expertly assessing the severity of the consequences and the likelihood that anobject will not be detected, by the frequency of emergencies. First, the risks with the highest Risk priority numberare eliminated. Possible scenarios and combinations of risk spectrum scenarios (technical, environmental, social,economic) have been identified. These priorities were ranked in descending order (from 10 to 0): the highest scorewas assigned to the maximum value (the most dangerous) that was given effect. The results of the expert evaluationof the signs of severity and non-detection obtained from one expert are presented. We show matrices of related traitseverity and non-detection traits, compiled by all experts. 16 experts participated in our work. Based on the rankingof expert indicators, matrices for estimating the impact of sources of risk for the choice of remediation direction andsubsequent use of natural-tech environments were constructed. The result was used to quantify the risk presented bythe criticality matrix of this indicating system, a measure of its impact on its reliability.
ESTIMATION OF RISKS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF NATURALLY TECHNOGENIC ENVIRONMENTS
Remez, N. (author) / Bronytskyi, V. (author)
2020-03-05
POWER ENGINEERING: economics, technique, ecology; № 4 (2019); 128-133 ; Науковий журнал «Енергетика: економіка, технології, екологія»; № 4 (2019); 128-133 ; 2308-7382 ; 1813-5420
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
METHOD FOR ARTIFICIAL DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOGENIC RESERVES
| European Patent Office | 2019
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
Method for preventing technogenic catastrophes
| British Library Online Contents | 2012
Technogenic-ecological aspects of underwater earthwork
| Online Contents | 1999