A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Incentives are widely used in construction procurement to motivate the contractor to make cost-reduction efforts. How to choose the right incentive intensity is a critical decision in construction procurement. In this regard, the principal-agent theory has been highly influential in theory and practice alike. However, this research argues that this theoretical model may lead to a biased decision. To demonstrate this point, this research draws on its modeling technique to analyze a standard pain-gain sharing arrangement in construction contracts, finding that taking no account of contract breakup hazards will result in underuse of incentives. When the outturn cost also depends on the contractor’s effort, high-powered incentives can better tap into the contractor’s efficiency improvement potential. The additional profit resulting from efficiency savings can serve as a buffer for downside cost shocks with the effect of reducing the likelihood of contract breakup. This benefit will make it desirable to use incentives more intensively than what is suggested by the principal-agent theory.
Incentives are widely used in construction procurement to motivate the contractor to make cost-reduction efforts. How to choose the right incentive intensity is a critical decision in construction procurement. In this regard, the principal-agent theory has been highly influential in theory and practice alike. However, this research argues that this theoretical model may lead to a biased decision. To demonstrate this point, this research draws on its modeling technique to analyze a standard pain-gain sharing arrangement in construction contracts, finding that taking no account of contract breakup hazards will result in underuse of incentives. When the outturn cost also depends on the contractor’s effort, high-powered incentives can better tap into the contractor’s efficiency improvement potential. The additional profit resulting from efficiency savings can serve as a buffer for downside cost shocks with the effect of reducing the likelihood of contract breakup. This benefit will make it desirable to use incentives more intensively than what is suggested by the principal-agent theory.
Principal-Agent Model of Risk Allocation in Construction Contracts and Its Critique
Chang, C (author)
2013-09-01
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , 140 (1) , Article 04013032. (2013)
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
Principal-Agent Model of Risk Allocation in Construction Contracts and Its Critique
| Online Contents | 2014
Principal-Agent Model of Risk Allocation in Construction Contracts and Its Critique
| British Library Online Contents | 2014
Impact of Risk Allocation in Construction Contracts
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
Optimum risk allocation model for construction contracts: fuzzy TOPSIS approach
| Online Contents | 2012