A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Emerging urban landmarks as vulnerable heritage
This issue of Eikonocity aims at bringing to the attention of scholars themes concerning the history and consequent vulnerability – mainly structural and aesthetic – of the ‘emerging’ elements of the historical buildings, conceived as tangible signs of the urban landscape identity in European historic centres. As recent Italian earthquakes have evidenced (L’Aquila, 2009; Emilia Romagna, 2012; Abruzzo and Umbria, 2016-2017), many historical buildings or parts of them, although having a significant role in the formation and expression of urban image, are highly at risk not only for physical safety but also for the collective memory they preserve. Visual poles as domes and towers, as authentic topoi of the city skyline, aggregate social values shared over the centuries and translated into landscape signs from different cultures during the history of local communities: they are important key-elements in the urban formation process intended as a long life collective project in which, as Michel Jacob pointed, citizens continually define their relationship with nature and territory. By the response these symbols of urban history are able to offer to natural or human hazards it largely descends the preservation of urban landscape image in the frame of identity and community cultural values.
Emerging urban landmarks as vulnerable heritage
This issue of Eikonocity aims at bringing to the attention of scholars themes concerning the history and consequent vulnerability – mainly structural and aesthetic – of the ‘emerging’ elements of the historical buildings, conceived as tangible signs of the urban landscape identity in European historic centres. As recent Italian earthquakes have evidenced (L’Aquila, 2009; Emilia Romagna, 2012; Abruzzo and Umbria, 2016-2017), many historical buildings or parts of them, although having a significant role in the formation and expression of urban image, are highly at risk not only for physical safety but also for the collective memory they preserve. Visual poles as domes and towers, as authentic topoi of the city skyline, aggregate social values shared over the centuries and translated into landscape signs from different cultures during the history of local communities: they are important key-elements in the urban formation process intended as a long life collective project in which, as Michel Jacob pointed, citizens continually define their relationship with nature and territory. By the response these symbols of urban history are able to offer to natural or human hazards it largely descends the preservation of urban landscape image in the frame of identity and community cultural values.
Emerging urban landmarks as vulnerable heritage
Russo, Valentina (author)
2020-06-30
doi:10.6092/2499-1422/7005
Eikonocity. Storia e Iconografia delle Città e dei Siti Europei; V. 5 N. 1 (2020); 7-8 ; Eikonocity. History and Iconography of European Cities and Sities; Vol 5 No 1 (2020); 7-8 ; 2499-1422
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
710
Regulars - Landmarks - Landscape Design celebrates urban landmarks
Online Contents | 2001
Regulars - Landmarks - Greenwich peninsula; Heritage lottery grants; new year honours
Online Contents | 2002
Sento at Sixth and Main: Preserving Landmarks of Japanese American Heritage
British Library Online Contents | 2003
|Research - Sento at Sixth and Main: Preserving Landmarks of Japanese American Heritage
Online Contents | 2003
|