A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Open sourcing as a profit-maximizing strategy for downstream firms
This paper characterizes and explores a corporate strategy in which downstream firms collaborate to develop open substitute designs for proprietary hardware they would otherwise purchase from upstream suppliers. This strategy centrally involves the downstream firms distributing design costs over multiple downstream firms – a strategy that is routine to producers selling to multiple downstream firms, but which has been in the past typically not practical for coalitions of downstream firms. Today, downstream firms find it increasingly feasible to co-design products they may all purchase due to two technological trends. First, CAD-CAM and other design technologies are lowering downstream firms’ costs to develop designs for purchased hardware inputs. Second, better communication technologies are lowering the costs of doing such projects collaboratively, even among large groups of downstream customer firms. Downstream firms collaborating to develop a design for a hardware input they all purchase could in principle choose to protect their design as a club good. However, opening up collaboratively-created designs to free riders can increase the profits of the contributing firms for several reasons we explore and model. Important among these is that free revealing draws free riders away from purchases of proprietary software or hardware to customer-developed free substitutes. This “scale stealing” mechanism reduces the markets of upstream suppliers of competing proprietary inputs. In the case of hardware only, free riders also contribute to reducing the average manufacturing costs of the open hardware by increasing purchase volumes and so creating increased economies of scale. Resulting reduced unit purchase costs benefit downstream firms contributing to the free design as well as free riders.
Open sourcing as a profit-maximizing strategy for downstream firms
This paper characterizes and explores a corporate strategy in which downstream firms collaborate to develop open substitute designs for proprietary hardware they would otherwise purchase from upstream suppliers. This strategy centrally involves the downstream firms distributing design costs over multiple downstream firms – a strategy that is routine to producers selling to multiple downstream firms, but which has been in the past typically not practical for coalitions of downstream firms. Today, downstream firms find it increasingly feasible to co-design products they may all purchase due to two technological trends. First, CAD-CAM and other design technologies are lowering downstream firms’ costs to develop designs for purchased hardware inputs. Second, better communication technologies are lowering the costs of doing such projects collaboratively, even among large groups of downstream customer firms. Downstream firms collaborating to develop a design for a hardware input they all purchase could in principle choose to protect their design as a club good. However, opening up collaboratively-created designs to free riders can increase the profits of the contributing firms for several reasons we explore and model. Important among these is that free revealing draws free riders away from purchases of proprietary software or hardware to customer-developed free substitutes. This “scale stealing” mechanism reduces the markets of upstream suppliers of competing proprietary inputs. In the case of hardware only, free riders also contribute to reducing the average manufacturing costs of the open hardware by increasing purchase volumes and so creating increased economies of scale. Resulting reduced unit purchase costs benefit downstream firms contributing to the free design as well as free riders.
Open sourcing as a profit-maximizing strategy for downstream firms
Gambardella, Alfonso (author) / Von Hippel, Eric (author) / Gambardella, Alfonso / Von Hippel, Eric
2019-01-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
Welfare-maximizing location versus profit-maximizing location
| Online Contents | 1986
Welfare-maximizing and profit-maximizing agroindustry location: A comparison
| Online Contents | 2000
Maximizing expected contractor profit using an integrated model
| Emerald Group Publishing | 2019
FM Sourcing Strategy - Strategic Planning
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997