A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production — Part 2: Cost Analysis
This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO2 avoided is between 42 €/tCO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/tCO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/tCO2. Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations ; Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis ; publishedVersion
Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production — Part 2: Cost Analysis
This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO2 avoided is between 42 €/tCO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/tCO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/tCO2. Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations ; Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis ; publishedVersion
Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production — Part 2: Cost Analysis
Gardarsdottir, Stefania Osk (author) / de Lena, Edoardo (author) / Romano, Matteo (author) / Roussanaly, Simon (author) / Voldsund, Mari (author) / Pérez-Calvo, José-Francisco (author) / Berstad, David Olsson (author) / Fu, Chao (author) / Anantharaman, Rahul (author) / Sutter, Daniel (author)
2019-01-01
cristin:1675756
12 ; Energies ; 3
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
Comparison of technologies for CO2 capture from cement production—Part 2: Cost analysis
| BASE | 2019
Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 1: Technical Evaluation
| BASE | 2019
Comparison of technologies for CO2 capture from cement production—Part 1: Technical evaluation
| BASE | 2019