A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Optimal retrofit solutions considering thermal comfort and intervention costs for the Mediterranean social housing stock
There is an impending need to retrofit the existing social housing stock to improve thermal comfort and to reduce energy demand. This research proposes calibrated building stock models to assess thermal comfort of the social housing stock of southern Spain (Mediterranean area). Several retrofit strategies are optimised using a genetic algorithm to obtain the best retrofit solutions, considering three objectives: annual overheating hours (%), annual undercooling hours (%) and investment costs (€/m2). Results are shown for four different climatic areas in southern Spain. This study finds that it is possible to retrofit the aforementioned stock considering investment costs from approximately 20–200 €/m2. The percentage of improvements for each climatic area are as follows: in Sevilla (B4 climatic area), investments costs up to 50 €/m2 led to 40% and 20% annual overheating and undercooling hours. In Cádiz, (A3 climatic area), 15% and 22% overheating and undercooling hours were achieved with medium-cost solutions (50–100 €/m2). In Almería (A4 climatic area), also medium-cost strategies reported approximately 15% and 30% overheating and undercooling hours. In Granada (C3 climatic area), 15% and 38% overheating and undercooling hours were obtained with medium-cost measures. Yet, applying high-cost solutions (100–200 €/m2) only significantly improved thermal comfort in Almería and Sevilla.
Optimal retrofit solutions considering thermal comfort and intervention costs for the Mediterranean social housing stock
There is an impending need to retrofit the existing social housing stock to improve thermal comfort and to reduce energy demand. This research proposes calibrated building stock models to assess thermal comfort of the social housing stock of southern Spain (Mediterranean area). Several retrofit strategies are optimised using a genetic algorithm to obtain the best retrofit solutions, considering three objectives: annual overheating hours (%), annual undercooling hours (%) and investment costs (€/m2). Results are shown for four different climatic areas in southern Spain. This study finds that it is possible to retrofit the aforementioned stock considering investment costs from approximately 20–200 €/m2. The percentage of improvements for each climatic area are as follows: in Sevilla (B4 climatic area), investments costs up to 50 €/m2 led to 40% and 20% annual overheating and undercooling hours. In Cádiz, (A3 climatic area), 15% and 22% overheating and undercooling hours were achieved with medium-cost solutions (50–100 €/m2). In Almería (A4 climatic area), also medium-cost strategies reported approximately 15% and 30% overheating and undercooling hours. In Granada (C3 climatic area), 15% and 38% overheating and undercooling hours were obtained with medium-cost measures. Yet, applying high-cost solutions (100–200 €/m2) only significantly improved thermal comfort in Almería and Sevilla.
Optimal retrofit solutions considering thermal comfort and intervention costs for the Mediterranean social housing stock
Calama-González, CM (author) / Symonds, P (author) / León-Rodríguez, ÁL (author) / Suárez, R (author)
2022-03-15
Energy and Buildings , 259 , Article 111915. (2022)
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
Alternative Comfort System for Retrofit in Renovated Social Housing in the Netherlands
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009
|A11 Alternative comfort system for retrofit in renovated social housing in the Netherlands
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009
|Optimal building retrofit pathways considering stock dynamics and climate change impacts
BASE | 2021
|Optimal building retrofit pathways considering stock dynamics and climate change impacts
BASE | 2021
|