A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Conclusions: Coming to Terms with Superdiversity?
Our quest in this book was to unravel how the city of Rotterdam comes to terms with its superdiverse character. It speaks to the rapidly evolving literature on superdiversity by taking as the central case study a city that may be representative of a much broader range of cities in Europe (and beyond) that seem reluctant in coming to terms with superdiversity, and that are not ranked as global cities. The example of Rotterdam reveals the spectrum of contradictions and paradoxes that come along with this uncomfortable relationship with superdiversity. Rotterdam is both a city of inclusion, the first with a mayor of Moroccan descent, and a city of exclusion, with political discourses in the City Council that are exclusionary and sometimes outright discriminatory. The core question to be addressed in this concluding chapter is why in some cities, like Rotterdam, the transformation into a superdiverse city is more problematic and accompanied by political upheaval, while in other cities it seems to be a more smooth process. The term superdiversity is merely describing a certain reality that characterizes Rotterdam and is not used as a normative term. With this book, we want to contribute to the growing literature that is trying to explain under which conditions a superdiverse city or neighbourhood is perceived by its inhabitants as an overall positive configuration and under which conditions people perceive it as being a more negative phenomenon and it leads to a more negative discourse.
Conclusions: Coming to Terms with Superdiversity?
Our quest in this book was to unravel how the city of Rotterdam comes to terms with its superdiverse character. It speaks to the rapidly evolving literature on superdiversity by taking as the central case study a city that may be representative of a much broader range of cities in Europe (and beyond) that seem reluctant in coming to terms with superdiversity, and that are not ranked as global cities. The example of Rotterdam reveals the spectrum of contradictions and paradoxes that come along with this uncomfortable relationship with superdiversity. Rotterdam is both a city of inclusion, the first with a mayor of Moroccan descent, and a city of exclusion, with political discourses in the City Council that are exclusionary and sometimes outright discriminatory. The core question to be addressed in this concluding chapter is why in some cities, like Rotterdam, the transformation into a superdiverse city is more problematic and accompanied by political upheaval, while in other cities it seems to be a more smooth process. The term superdiversity is merely describing a certain reality that characterizes Rotterdam and is not used as a normative term. With this book, we want to contribute to the growing literature that is trying to explain under which conditions a superdiverse city or neighbourhood is perceived by its inhabitants as an overall positive configuration and under which conditions people perceive it as being a more negative phenomenon and it leads to a more negative discourse.
Conclusions: Coming to Terms with Superdiversity?
Crul, M.R.J. (author) / Scholten, Peter (author) / Crul, Maurice / Scholten, Peter / van Laar, Paul
2019-01-01
Crul , M R J & Scholten , P 2019 , Conclusions: Coming to Terms with Superdiversity? in M Crul , P Scholten & P van Laar (eds) , Coming to Terms with Superdiversity : The Case of Rotterdam . IMISCOE Research Series , Springer Open , pp. 225-235 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96041-8_12
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
720
Expanding Superdiversity in Australian Cities and Regional Towns
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2024
|Submission Summary: Superdiversity and the Draft National Urban Policy
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2024
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
|Coming to Terms with the Present
Online Contents | 2004
|Coming to Terms with Power Lines
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2012
|