A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Frictional behaviour of three critical geosynthetic interfaces
This paper’s scope is the shear interaction mechanisms of three critical geosynthetic interfaces (geotextile/geomembrane; drainage geocomposite/geomembrane and soil/geomembrane) typically used for lined containment facilities such as landfills. A large direct shear machine was used to carry out 159 geosynthetic interface tests. The results showed strain softening behaviour, a very small dilatancy, 0.1–1 mm, and non-linear failure envelopes at normal stress range of 25–500 kPa. The three types of interfaces present the same main interaction mechanisms: interlocking and friction. For geotextile/geomembrane and drainage geocomposite/geomembrane interfaces, the higher the asperity height, the higher the interface shear strength.Whereas for soil/geomembrane interfaces, the higher the soil shear strength, the higher the interface shear strength. The drainage geocomposite/geomembrane interface showed the lowest friction angles, followed by the geotextile/geomembrane and the soil/geomembrane interfaces.
Frictional behaviour of three critical geosynthetic interfaces
This paper’s scope is the shear interaction mechanisms of three critical geosynthetic interfaces (geotextile/geomembrane; drainage geocomposite/geomembrane and soil/geomembrane) typically used for lined containment facilities such as landfills. A large direct shear machine was used to carry out 159 geosynthetic interface tests. The results showed strain softening behaviour, a very small dilatancy, 0.1–1 mm, and non-linear failure envelopes at normal stress range of 25–500 kPa. The three types of interfaces present the same main interaction mechanisms: interlocking and friction. For geotextile/geomembrane and drainage geocomposite/geomembrane interfaces, the higher the asperity height, the higher the interface shear strength.Whereas for soil/geomembrane interfaces, the higher the soil shear strength, the higher the interface shear strength. The drainage geocomposite/geomembrane interface showed the lowest friction angles, followed by the geotextile/geomembrane and the soil/geomembrane interfaces.
Frictional behaviour of three critical geosynthetic interfaces
Cañizal Berini, Jorge (author) / Konietzky, H. (author) / Martínez Bacas, Ana Belén (author) / Universidad de Cantabria
2015-10-01
doi:10.1680/jgein.15.00017
Geosynthetics International Vol. 22 (5), October, 2015, pp. 355-365
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
Factors Influencing Dynamic Frictional Behavior of Geosynthetic Interfaces
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
Testing Methods For Soil-Geosynthetic Frictional Behaviour - Japanese Standard
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
Dynamic shear behaviour of geosynthetic interfaces
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997