A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Recommendations of the European Seismological Commission (ESC) for the Post Hyogo Framework of Action (HFA2)
ESC community held a PostHyogo consultation by using a questionnaire prepared by ESC Executive Commiee (ExeCom) in 2014. Six questions were posed to the ESC community, asking for additional comments not specifically included within the questions. e questions were: 1. What is the role of ESC at regional and international level for improving the understanding of disaster (especially earthquake) risk reduction and building resilience? 2. How effectively has the Hyogo Framework of Action been implemented by countries and scientific community (especially ESC Members)? 3. Can you give some examples of how earthquake community has benefited from HFA between 2005-today (one or two outcomes)? 4. What do you think should be three main components that needs to be further addressed in a post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction (considering primarily the earthquake risk mitigation)? 5. How do we improve the science and policy dialogue to ensure that decisions are informed by science? Examples? 6. What could be the top three seismology related issues important to building earthquake resiliency that can be addressed in a post-2015 international risk reduction strategy? ; Peer reviewed
Recommendations of the European Seismological Commission (ESC) for the Post Hyogo Framework of Action (HFA2)
ESC community held a PostHyogo consultation by using a questionnaire prepared by ESC Executive Commiee (ExeCom) in 2014. Six questions were posed to the ESC community, asking for additional comments not specifically included within the questions. e questions were: 1. What is the role of ESC at regional and international level for improving the understanding of disaster (especially earthquake) risk reduction and building resilience? 2. How effectively has the Hyogo Framework of Action been implemented by countries and scientific community (especially ESC Members)? 3. Can you give some examples of how earthquake community has benefited from HFA between 2005-today (one or two outcomes)? 4. What do you think should be three main components that needs to be further addressed in a post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction (considering primarily the earthquake risk mitigation)? 5. How do we improve the science and policy dialogue to ensure that decisions are informed by science? Examples? 6. What could be the top three seismology related issues important to building earthquake resiliency that can be addressed in a post-2015 international risk reduction strategy? ; Peer reviewed
Recommendations of the European Seismological Commission (ESC) for the Post Hyogo Framework of Action (HFA2)
Zavyalov, Alexey (author) / Nurlu, Murat (author) / García-Fernández, Mariano (author) / Parolai, Stefano (author) / Kuterdem, Kerem (author)
2014-01-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
710
XXII General Assembly of European Seismological Commission
Online Contents | 1989
The Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake of 17 January 1995: Seismological aspects and ground motions
| Online Contents | 1996
The Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake of 17 January 1995: seismological aspects and ground motions
| British Library Online Contents | 1996
Mitigasi Bencana Alam di Kek Tanjung Lesung, Sudahkah Hyogo Framework for Action Diterapkan?
| BASE | 2021
Rooftecture, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan
Online Contents | 1999