A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning
Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing "boundaries" between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to "boundary work". This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs' perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.
Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning
Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing "boundaries" between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to "boundary work". This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs' perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.
Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning
Adem Esmail, Blal (Ph.D.) (author) / Anderson, Cyrus Carl (Dr. rer. nat.) (author) / Bast, Sigvard (M. Sc.) (author) / Cortinovis, Chiara (author) / Suleiman, Lina (author) / Kato-Huerta, Jarumi (Dr.-Ing.) (author) / Högström, Johan (author) / Balfors, Berit (Prof. Dr.-Ing.) (author) / Arciniegas, Gustavo (Dr. rer. nat.) (author) / Geneletti, Davide (Prof. Dr.) (author)
2024-10-19
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Collaborative Geodesign to advance multifunctional landscapes
| Online Contents | 2016
Geodesign : case studies in regional and urban planning
| TIBKAT | 2012