A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Land use planning in disputed mountain areas: conflicting interests and common arenas
Mountain areas are often subject to conflicts between different user interests and protection. The authors examine land use planning processes in Norway applied in accordance with the Planning and Building Act and the Nature Diversity Act and discuss how they might be improved. They find that although influenced by trends of decentralization, inclusion and integration, and principles for multilevel governance, the land use planning approaches for use and protection are still performed in the shadow of instrumentalism and hierarchy with little awareness of their limitations in practical use. The “communicative turn” has stimulated comprehensive participation processes, but these consensus-oriented processes have to a little extent been able to handle conflicting interests. The authors conclude that in future planning it will be vital to establish common arenas as trading zones for coordinated municipal, regional and national planning, combining instrumental and communicative practices with agonistic approaches in a multilevel governance network. ; publishedVersion ; 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way
Land use planning in disputed mountain areas: conflicting interests and common arenas
Mountain areas are often subject to conflicts between different user interests and protection. The authors examine land use planning processes in Norway applied in accordance with the Planning and Building Act and the Nature Diversity Act and discuss how they might be improved. They find that although influenced by trends of decentralization, inclusion and integration, and principles for multilevel governance, the land use planning approaches for use and protection are still performed in the shadow of instrumentalism and hierarchy with little awareness of their limitations in practical use. The “communicative turn” has stimulated comprehensive participation processes, but these consensus-oriented processes have to a little extent been able to handle conflicting interests. The authors conclude that in future planning it will be vital to establish common arenas as trading zones for coordinated municipal, regional and national planning, combining instrumental and communicative practices with agonistic approaches in a multilevel governance network. ; publishedVersion ; 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way
Land use planning in disputed mountain areas: conflicting interests and common arenas
Skjeggedal, Terje (author) / Flemsæter, Frode (author) / Gundersen, Vegard (author)
2020-01-01
cristin:1835876
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
710
Conflicting interests in cycleway design
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
Water Conservation, Conflicting Interests and Public Education
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1979
Conflicting interests between local governments and the European target of no net land take
| BASE | 2023
Japan's regional airports: conflicting national, regional and local interests
| Online Contents | 2002
East Mediterranean Gas Forum: Regional Cooperation Amid Conflicting Interests
TIBKAT | 2000