A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG TIANG AKSIAL TUNGGAL DENGAN METODE STATIS DAN DINAMIS TERHADAP HASIL UJI PILE DRIVING ANALYZE (PDA) PADA PEKERJAAN PONDASI PROYEK JAKARTA BOX TOWER
The purpose of this research is to know the ratio of bearing pile capacity with some static and dynamic calculation method to Pile Driving Analyze (PDA) dynamic test result.The analysis uses static calculations using several methods namely, Meyerhoff, Vesic, α Thomlinson, and α Terzaghi, Peck andMesrimethods.Consultantcalculation using Reese & Wright method. Dynamic bearing capacity uses jacking pilerecord fromHydrolicSystem Pile Driving (HSPD) andPile Driving Analyze test results.The results showed that Reese & Wright method with SPT is the most closely approximated PDA test result with percentage 74,72%; 76.79% and 82.83% for number ofpile310, 368 and 763. While the result of comparison of jacking pile record that most approached PDA is on pile number 638 with a percentage of 82.83%. The largest settlement results are at pile number 310 and 763 with a decrease of 26.3 mm and 25.9 mm with αVesic+Terzaghi, Peck andMesrimethod
ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG TIANG AKSIAL TUNGGAL DENGAN METODE STATIS DAN DINAMIS TERHADAP HASIL UJI PILE DRIVING ANALYZE (PDA) PADA PEKERJAAN PONDASI PROYEK JAKARTA BOX TOWER
The purpose of this research is to know the ratio of bearing pile capacity with some static and dynamic calculation method to Pile Driving Analyze (PDA) dynamic test result.The analysis uses static calculations using several methods namely, Meyerhoff, Vesic, α Thomlinson, and α Terzaghi, Peck andMesrimethods.Consultantcalculation using Reese & Wright method. Dynamic bearing capacity uses jacking pilerecord fromHydrolicSystem Pile Driving (HSPD) andPile Driving Analyze test results.The results showed that Reese & Wright method with SPT is the most closely approximated PDA test result with percentage 74,72%; 76.79% and 82.83% for number ofpile310, 368 and 763. While the result of comparison of jacking pile record that most approached PDA is on pile number 638 with a percentage of 82.83%. The largest settlement results are at pile number 310 and 763 with a decrease of 26.3 mm and 25.9 mm with αVesic+Terzaghi, Peck andMesrimethod
ANALISIS DAYA DUKUNG TIANG AKSIAL TUNGGAL DENGAN METODE STATIS DAN DINAMIS TERHADAP HASIL UJI PILE DRIVING ANALYZE (PDA) PADA PEKERJAAN PONDASI PROYEK JAKARTA BOX TOWER
Sari, Evi Puspita (author) / Prihantono, Prihantono (author) / Musalamah, Sittati (author)
2019-07-01
doi:10.21009/jmenara.v14i2.18119
Menara: Jurnal Teknik Sipil; Vol 14 No 2 (2019): Menara: Jurnal Teknik Sipil ; 2622-5549 ; 1907-4360
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
ANALISIS KAPASITAS DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG PANCANG DENGAN METODE US.ARMY CORPS
| BASE | 2024
| BASE | 2022
PENGARUH ELEKTROKINETIK TERHADAP DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI TIANG DI LEMPUNG MARINA
| DOAJ | 2006