A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Could urban greening mitigate suburban thermal inequity?: the role of residents' dispositions and household practices
Over the past decade research on urban thermal inequity has grown, with a focus on denser built environments. In this letter we examine thermal inequity associated with climate change impacts and changes to urban form in a comparatively socio-economically disadvantaged Australian suburb. Local urban densification policies designed to counteract sprawl have reduced block sizes, increased height limits, and diminished urban tree canopy cover (UTC). Little attention has been given to the combined effects of lowerUTCand increased heat on disadvantaged residents. Such impacts include rising energy expenditure to maintain thermal comfort (i.e. cooling dwellings).We used a survey of residents (n=230) to determine their perceptions of climate change impacts; household energy costs; household thermal comfort practices; and dispositions towards using green infrastructure to combat heat. Results suggest that while comparatively disadvantaged residents spend more on energy as a proportion of their income, they appear to have reduced capacity to adapt to climate change at the household scale.Wefound most residents favoured more urban greening and supported tree planting in local parks and streets. Findings have implications for policy responses aimed at achieving urban climate justice. ; Griffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environment ; Full Text
Could urban greening mitigate suburban thermal inequity?: the role of residents' dispositions and household practices
Over the past decade research on urban thermal inequity has grown, with a focus on denser built environments. In this letter we examine thermal inequity associated with climate change impacts and changes to urban form in a comparatively socio-economically disadvantaged Australian suburb. Local urban densification policies designed to counteract sprawl have reduced block sizes, increased height limits, and diminished urban tree canopy cover (UTC). Little attention has been given to the combined effects of lowerUTCand increased heat on disadvantaged residents. Such impacts include rising energy expenditure to maintain thermal comfort (i.e. cooling dwellings).We used a survey of residents (n=230) to determine their perceptions of climate change impacts; household energy costs; household thermal comfort practices; and dispositions towards using green infrastructure to combat heat. Results suggest that while comparatively disadvantaged residents spend more on energy as a proportion of their income, they appear to have reduced capacity to adapt to climate change at the household scale.Wefound most residents favoured more urban greening and supported tree planting in local parks and streets. Findings have implications for policy responses aimed at achieving urban climate justice. ; Griffith Sciences, Griffith School of Environment ; Full Text
Could urban greening mitigate suburban thermal inequity?: the role of residents' dispositions and household practices
Byrne, Jason (author) / Ambrey, Christopher (author) / Portanger, Chloe (author) / Lo, Alex (author) / Matthews, Tony (author) / Baker, Douglas (author) / Davison, Aidan (author)
2016-01-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown , English
Who's greener? Comparing urban and suburban residents' environmental behaviour and concern
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2015
|Greening slope protection system for suburban park slopes
European Patent Office | 2023
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
|