A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Energy Footprint of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms Beyond Proof-of-Work
Popular permissionless distributed ledger technology (DLT) systems using proof-of-work (PoW) for Sybil attack resistance have extreme energy requirements, drawing stern criticism from academia, business and the media. DLT systems building on alternative consensus mechanisms, particularly proof-of-stake (PoS), aim to address this downside. In this paper, we take an initial step towards comparing the energy requirements of such systems to understand whether they achieve this goal equally well. While multiple studies have analysed the energy demands of individual blockchains, little comparative work has been done. We approach this research gap by formalising a basic consumption model for PoS blockchains. Applying this model to six archetypal blockchains generates three main findings. First, we confirm the concerns around the energy footprint of PoW by showing that Bitcoin's energy consumption exceeds the energy consumption of all PoS-based systems analysed by at least three orders of magnitude. Second, we illustrate that there are significant differences in energy consumption among the PoS-based systems analysed, with permissionless systems having a larger energy footprint overall owing to their higher replication factor. Third, we point out that the type of hardware that validators use has a considerable impact on whether the energy consumption of PoS blockchains is comparable with or considerably larger than that of centralised systems.
Energy Footprint of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms Beyond Proof-of-Work
Popular permissionless distributed ledger technology (DLT) systems using proof-of-work (PoW) for Sybil attack resistance have extreme energy requirements, drawing stern criticism from academia, business and the media. DLT systems building on alternative consensus mechanisms, particularly proof-of-stake (PoS), aim to address this downside. In this paper, we take an initial step towards comparing the energy requirements of such systems to understand whether they achieve this goal equally well. While multiple studies have analysed the energy demands of individual blockchains, little comparative work has been done. We approach this research gap by formalising a basic consumption model for PoS blockchains. Applying this model to six archetypal blockchains generates three main findings. First, we confirm the concerns around the energy footprint of PoW by showing that Bitcoin's energy consumption exceeds the energy consumption of all PoS-based systems analysed by at least three orders of magnitude. Second, we illustrate that there are significant differences in energy consumption among the PoS-based systems analysed, with permissionless systems having a larger energy footprint overall owing to their higher replication factor. Third, we point out that the type of hardware that validators use has a considerable impact on whether the energy consumption of PoS blockchains is comparable with or considerably larger than that of centralised systems.
Energy Footprint of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms Beyond Proof-of-Work
Platt, Moritz (author) / Sedlmeir, Johannes (author) / Platt, Daniel (author) / Tasca, Paolo (author) / Xu, Jiahua (author) / Vadgama, Nikhil (author) / Ibañez, Juan Ignacio (author)
2022-04-01
In: 2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C). (pp. pp. 1135-1144). IEEE: Hainan, China. (2022)
Paper
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
Robust Proof of Stake: A New Consensus Protocol for Sustainable Blockchain Systems
| DOAJ | 2020
Physical One‐Way Functions for Decentralized Consensus Via Proof of Physical Work
| Wiley | 2025
Physical One‐Way Functions for Decentralized Consensus Via Proof of Physical Work
| Wiley | 2025