A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The aporetic financialisation of insurance liabilities: Reserving under Solvency II
The valuation of insurance liabilities has traditionally been dealt with by actuaries, who closely monitored underlying illiquid features, assumed a long-term perspective, and exercised their own subjective, expert judgment. However, the new EU regulatory regime of Solvency II (S2) has come to require market-consistent valuation supplemented by a risk-sensitive capital. This is considered an unwanted shift towards short-termism that is misaligned with the industry’s long term and countercyclical character. The new principles place the ‘technicalising’ logic of financial economics over ‘contextualising’ actuarial know-how. Following existing analytics of valuation from the ethnography of reinsurance markets and the social studies of finance, such requirements appear either as an alarming attack against the actuarial component of traditional valuation practice, or else as a preserver of it, through a process of enfolding at the heart of the financialisation project. This article holds that the case of S2 challenges both these analytics of valuation. S2’s financialisation project, precisely by attempting to construct itself, deconstructs itself into an actuarial project, in a recurring, aporetic process. In this respect, fair (or otherwise) valuation remains always undecidable, inconclusive, and thus responsible.
The aporetic financialisation of insurance liabilities: Reserving under Solvency II
The valuation of insurance liabilities has traditionally been dealt with by actuaries, who closely monitored underlying illiquid features, assumed a long-term perspective, and exercised their own subjective, expert judgment. However, the new EU regulatory regime of Solvency II (S2) has come to require market-consistent valuation supplemented by a risk-sensitive capital. This is considered an unwanted shift towards short-termism that is misaligned with the industry’s long term and countercyclical character. The new principles place the ‘technicalising’ logic of financial economics over ‘contextualising’ actuarial know-how. Following existing analytics of valuation from the ethnography of reinsurance markets and the social studies of finance, such requirements appear either as an alarming attack against the actuarial component of traditional valuation practice, or else as a preserver of it, through a process of enfolding at the heart of the financialisation project. This article holds that the case of S2 challenges both these analytics of valuation. S2’s financialisation project, precisely by attempting to construct itself, deconstructs itself into an actuarial project, in a recurring, aporetic process. In this respect, fair (or otherwise) valuation remains always undecidable, inconclusive, and thus responsible.
The aporetic financialisation of insurance liabilities: Reserving under Solvency II
Fytros, Charalampos (author)
2021-05-04
doi:10.2218/finsoc.v7i1.5589
Finance and Society; Vol 7 No 1 (2021); 20-39 ; 2059-5999 ; 10.2218/finsoc.v7i1
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
Quantitative Analyses of Transition Pension Liabilities and Solvency Sustainability in China
| DOAJ | 2017
Insurance issues surrounding pipe‐related liabilities
| Wiley | 2000
Legal - Insurance liabilities in JCT contracts can be bewildering
| Online Contents | 2001
British Library Online Contents | 2007