A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Influence of energy density of different light sources on knoop hardness of a dual-cured resin cement
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness of a dual-cured resin-based luting cement irradiated with different light sources as well energy density through a ceramic sample. Three light-curing unit (LCUs) were tested: tungsten halogen light (HAL), light-emitting diode (LED) and xenon plasma-arc (PAC) lamp. Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated from a resin-based cement (Enforce). Three energy doses were used by modifying the irradiance (I) of each LCU and the irradiation time (T): 24 Jcm-2 (I/2x2T), 24 Jcm-2 (IxT) and 48 Jcm-2 (Ix2T). Energy doses were applied through a 2.0-mm-thick ceramic sample (Duceram Plus). Three groups underwent direct irradiation over the resin cement with the different LCUs and a chemically-activated group served as a control. Thirteen groups were tested (n=10). Knoop hardness number (KHN) means were obtained from cross-sectional areas. Two-way ANOVA and the Holm-Sidak method were used for statistical comparisons of activation mode and energy doses (a=5%). Application of 48 J.cm-2 energy dose through the ceramic using LED (50.5±2.8) and HAL (50.9±3.7) produced significantly higher KHN means (p
Influence of energy density of different light sources on knoop hardness of a dual-cured resin cement
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness of a dual-cured resin-based luting cement irradiated with different light sources as well energy density through a ceramic sample. Three light-curing unit (LCUs) were tested: tungsten halogen light (HAL), light-emitting diode (LED) and xenon plasma-arc (PAC) lamp. Disc-shaped specimens were fabricated from a resin-based cement (Enforce). Three energy doses were used by modifying the irradiance (I) of each LCU and the irradiation time (T): 24 Jcm-2 (I/2x2T), 24 Jcm-2 (IxT) and 48 Jcm-2 (Ix2T). Energy doses were applied through a 2.0-mm-thick ceramic sample (Duceram Plus). Three groups underwent direct irradiation over the resin cement with the different LCUs and a chemically-activated group served as a control. Thirteen groups were tested (n=10). Knoop hardness number (KHN) means were obtained from cross-sectional areas. Two-way ANOVA and the Holm-Sidak method were used for statistical comparisons of activation mode and energy doses (a=5%). Application of 48 J.cm-2 energy dose through the ceramic using LED (50.5±2.8) and HAL (50.9±3.7) produced significantly higher KHN means (p
Influence of energy density of different light sources on knoop hardness of a dual-cured resin cement
Piva, Evandro (author) / Correr-Sobrinho, Lourenço (author) / Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre Coelho (author) / Consani, Simonides (author) / Demarco, Flávio Fernando (author) / Powers, John Michael (author)
2008-06-01
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 16, n. 3 (2008); 189-193 ; 1678-7765 ; 1678-7757
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
Determination of True Knoop Hardness
British Library Online Contents | 2000
|Knoop hardness of dental resin cements: Effect of veneering material and light curing methods
British Library Online Contents | 2007
|Knoop hardness and fracture anisotropy of calcite
British Library Online Contents | 1993
|The Knoop hardness yield locus of Ti-24Al-11Nb alloy
British Library Online Contents | 2003
|Degree of conversion and knoop hardness of Z250 composite using different photo-activation methods
British Library Online Contents | 2005
|