A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ECONOMICAL DESIGN ASPECT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE T-GIRDER WITH BOX-GIRDER BRIDGES
The purpose of present study is the design to exploring the economic analysis for superstructure for different span length both for reinforced concrete T- girder and Box girder bridge super structures. The analysis and design is done under Ethiopia Road Authority (ERA) and (AASHTO) loading for selection of most economical section for different span length of super structures. In present study a two lane simply supported Reinforced concrete T-girder and Box-girder Bridge was analyses for dead load and moving load. The dead load calculation has been done manually and for live load linear analysis is done on SAP2000V14. In normal ground conditions, reinforced concrete T- girder bridge structure is more economical than Box girder bridge for shorter span(12m to 20m) and Box girder bridge‟s more economical for longer span(15m to 36m). The present paper will facilitate as a hand on tool for selection of economical superstructure type for 14m, 18m, 24m, 30m,and 34m span length bridges. The present study aims to develop an economic solution for construction of superstructure for different span bridge under Ethiopia Road Authority (ERA) and (AASHTO) loading. A comparative study on the basis of cost of materials (construction cost) is conducted to select and identify the economical span range of T-girder and Box-girder bridges.
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ECONOMICAL DESIGN ASPECT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE T-GIRDER WITH BOX-GIRDER BRIDGES
The purpose of present study is the design to exploring the economic analysis for superstructure for different span length both for reinforced concrete T- girder and Box girder bridge super structures. The analysis and design is done under Ethiopia Road Authority (ERA) and (AASHTO) loading for selection of most economical section for different span length of super structures. In present study a two lane simply supported Reinforced concrete T-girder and Box-girder Bridge was analyses for dead load and moving load. The dead load calculation has been done manually and for live load linear analysis is done on SAP2000V14. In normal ground conditions, reinforced concrete T- girder bridge structure is more economical than Box girder bridge for shorter span(12m to 20m) and Box girder bridge‟s more economical for longer span(15m to 36m). The present paper will facilitate as a hand on tool for selection of economical superstructure type for 14m, 18m, 24m, 30m,and 34m span length bridges. The present study aims to develop an economic solution for construction of superstructure for different span bridge under Ethiopia Road Authority (ERA) and (AASHTO) loading. A comparative study on the basis of cost of materials (construction cost) is conducted to select and identify the economical span range of T-girder and Box-girder bridges.
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ECONOMICAL DESIGN ASPECT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE T-GIRDER WITH BOX-GIRDER BRIDGES
Degera Gezahegn Gudeta (author)
2017-01-01
doi:10.20372/nadre:1547966265.42
Theses
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
Economical Steel Box Girder Bridges
| British Library Online Contents | 1993
Economical Steel Box Girder Bridges
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
Economical Steel Box Girder Bridges
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
Long span reinforced-concrete girder bridges
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1910