A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Geoscience Engagement in Global Development Frameworks
During 2015, the international community agreed three socio-environmental global development frameworks, the: (i) Sustainable Development Goals, (ii) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, and (iii) Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Each corresponds to important interactions between environmental processes and society. Here we synthesize the role of geoscientists in the delivery of each framework, and explore the meaning of and justification for increased geoscience engagement (active participation). We first demonstrate that geoscience is fundamental to successfully achieving the objectives of each framework. We proceed to characterize four types of geoscience engagement (framework design, promotion, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation), and present examples of engagement within the scope of the geoscience community. In the context of this characterization, we discuss: (i) our ethical responsibility to engage with these frameworks, noting the emphasis on societal cooperation within the Cape Town Statement on Geoethics; and (ii) the need for increased and higher quality engagement, including an improved understanding of the science-policy-practice interface. Facilitating increased engagement is necessary if we are to maximize geoscience’s positive impact on global development.
Geoscience Engagement in Global Development Frameworks
During 2015, the international community agreed three socio-environmental global development frameworks, the: (i) Sustainable Development Goals, (ii) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, and (iii) Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Each corresponds to important interactions between environmental processes and society. Here we synthesize the role of geoscientists in the delivery of each framework, and explore the meaning of and justification for increased geoscience engagement (active participation). We first demonstrate that geoscience is fundamental to successfully achieving the objectives of each framework. We proceed to characterize four types of geoscience engagement (framework design, promotion, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation), and present examples of engagement within the scope of the geoscience community. In the context of this characterization, we discuss: (i) our ethical responsibility to engage with these frameworks, noting the emphasis on societal cooperation within the Cape Town Statement on Geoethics; and (ii) the need for increased and higher quality engagement, including an improved understanding of the science-policy-practice interface. Facilitating increased engagement is necessary if we are to maximize geoscience’s positive impact on global development.
Geoscience Engagement in Global Development Frameworks
Gill, Joel C. (author) / Bullough, Florence (author)
2017-10-05
doi:10.4401/ag-7460
Annals of Geophysics; V. 60 (2017): Fast Track 7: Geoethics at the heart of all geoscience ; Annals of Geophysics; Vol. 60 (2017): Fast Track 7: Geoethics at the heart of all geoscience ; 2037-416X ; 1593-5213
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
710
ExxonMobil geoscience: global opportunities and career-long development
British Library Online Contents | 2007
|TIBKAT | 1996
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2013
|Near surface geoscience; Near surface geoscience rains down benefits
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2013
Environmental geoscience Airborne EM applied to environmental geoscience in the UK
British Library Online Contents | 2002
|