A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A systematic review of recent developments in disaster waste management
Disaster waste management received increasing attention in recent years, but there was no review updating the evolving development after the study of Brown et al. (2011a). To explore how the topics in disaster waste management evolved in recent years and to analyze whether the gaps identified by Brown et al. (2011a) are covered, 82 papers published from 2011 to 2019 were selected from the Scopus database based on the defined process and criteria. This paper systematically examines the disaster waste management research from nine aspects of planning, waste, waste treatment options, environment, economics, social considerations, organizational aspects, legal frameworks and funding. The results suggested that there were no obvious changes or developments in the field of disaster waste management, although a few research gaps have been addressed, such as waste separation, waste quantities, case studies of incineration and waste to energy, direct economic effects, social considerations as well as application of GIS technology. Except for the comparative studies, future directions were suggested by the gaps that persist since Brown et al. (2011a) and the new gaps that were identified in this review. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. ; Funding Agencies|National Natural Science Foundation of China [71672074]; Scientific Research Start-up Foundation for Introduction of Advanced Talents in Chongqing Technology and Business University [1955011]; Research Project of Chongqing Technology and Business University; Twelfth Five-Year Planning Project of Philosophy and Social Science of Guangdong Province [GD15CGL07]
A systematic review of recent developments in disaster waste management
Disaster waste management received increasing attention in recent years, but there was no review updating the evolving development after the study of Brown et al. (2011a). To explore how the topics in disaster waste management evolved in recent years and to analyze whether the gaps identified by Brown et al. (2011a) are covered, 82 papers published from 2011 to 2019 were selected from the Scopus database based on the defined process and criteria. This paper systematically examines the disaster waste management research from nine aspects of planning, waste, waste treatment options, environment, economics, social considerations, organizational aspects, legal frameworks and funding. The results suggested that there were no obvious changes or developments in the field of disaster waste management, although a few research gaps have been addressed, such as waste separation, waste quantities, case studies of incineration and waste to energy, direct economic effects, social considerations as well as application of GIS technology. Except for the comparative studies, future directions were suggested by the gaps that persist since Brown et al. (2011a) and the new gaps that were identified in this review. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. ; Funding Agencies|National Natural Science Foundation of China [71672074]; Scientific Research Start-up Foundation for Introduction of Advanced Talents in Chongqing Technology and Business University [1955011]; Research Project of Chongqing Technology and Business University; Twelfth Five-Year Planning Project of Philosophy and Social Science of Guangdong Province [GD15CGL07]
A systematic review of recent developments in disaster waste management
Zhang, Fanshun (author) / Cao, Cejun (author) / Li, Congdong (author) / Liu, Yang (author) / Huisingh, Donald (author)
2019-01-01
ISI:000482491500069
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
710
SDN based V2X Networks for Disaster Management: A Systematic Literature Review
| BASE | 2021
Recent Developments in Waste Management : Select Proceedings of Recycle 2018
| UB Braunschweig | 2020
Generation and Management of Disaster Waste
| Online Contents | 1996
A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making in disaster management
| BASE | 2020