A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
BECCS with combined heat and power: Assessing the energy penalty
Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is widely recognised as an important carbon dioxide removal technology. Nevertheless, BECCS has mostly failed to move beyond small-scale demonstration units. One main factor is the energy penalty incurred on power plants. In previous studies, this penalty has been determined to be 37.2 %?48.6 % for the amine capture technology. The aim of this study is to quantify the energy penalty for adding the hot potassium carbonate (HPC) capture technology to a biomass-fired combined heat and power (CHP) plant, connected to a district heating system. In this context, the energy driving the capture process is partly recovered as useful district heating. Therefore, a modified energy penalty is proposed, with the inclusion of recovered heat. This inclusion is especially meaningful if the heat has a substantial monetary value. The BECCS system is examined using thermodynamic analysis, coupled with modelling of the capture process in Aspen PlusTM. Model validation is performed with data from a BECCS test facility. The results of this study show that the modified energy penalty is in the range of 2%?4%. These findings could potentially increase the attractiveness of BECCS as a climate abatement option in a district heating CHP setting.
BECCS with combined heat and power: Assessing the energy penalty
Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is widely recognised as an important carbon dioxide removal technology. Nevertheless, BECCS has mostly failed to move beyond small-scale demonstration units. One main factor is the energy penalty incurred on power plants. In previous studies, this penalty has been determined to be 37.2 %?48.6 % for the amine capture technology. The aim of this study is to quantify the energy penalty for adding the hot potassium carbonate (HPC) capture technology to a biomass-fired combined heat and power (CHP) plant, connected to a district heating system. In this context, the energy driving the capture process is partly recovered as useful district heating. Therefore, a modified energy penalty is proposed, with the inclusion of recovered heat. This inclusion is especially meaningful if the heat has a substantial monetary value. The BECCS system is examined using thermodynamic analysis, coupled with modelling of the capture process in Aspen PlusTM. Model validation is performed with data from a BECCS test facility. The results of this study show that the modified energy penalty is in the range of 2%?4%. These findings could potentially increase the attractiveness of BECCS as a climate abatement option in a district heating CHP setting.
BECCS with combined heat and power: Assessing the energy penalty
Gustafsson, Kare (author) / Sadegh-Vaziri, Ramiar (author) / Gronkvist, Stefan (author) / Levihn, Fabian (author) / Sundberg, Cecilia (author)
2021-01-01
Gustafsson, Kare and Sadegh-Vaziri, Ramiar and Gronkvist, Stefan and Levihn, Fabian and Sundberg, Cecilia (2021). BECCS with combined heat and power: Assessing the energy penalty. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 108 , 103248 [Research article]
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
BECCS with combined heat and power: Assessing the energy penalty
Elsevier | 2020
|BECCS with combined heat and power: assessing the energy penalty
Elsevier | 2021
|