A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Air seal performance of personalized and statistically shaped 3D-printed face masks compared with market-available surgical and FFP2 masks
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has revealed alarming shortages of personal protective equipment for frontline healthcare professionals and the general public. Therefore, a 3D-printable mask frame was developed, and its air seal performance was evaluated and compared. Personalized masks (PM) based on individual face scans (n = 8) and a statistically shaped mask (SSM) based on a standardized facial soft tissue shape computed from 190 face scans were designed. Subsequently, the masks were additively manufactured, and in a second step, the PM and SSM were compared to surgical masks (SM) and FFP2 masks (FFP2) in terms of air seal performance. 3D-printed face models allowed for air leakage evaluation by measuring the pressure inside the mask in sealed and unsealed conditions during a breathing simulation. The PM demonstrated the lowest leak flow (p < 0.01) of inspired or expired unfiltered air of approximately 10.4 ± 16.4%, whereas the SM showed the highest (p < 0.01) leakage with 84.9 ± 7.7%. The FFP2 and SSM had similar values of 34.9 ± 18.5% leakage (p > 0.68). The developed framework allows for the time- and resource-efficient, on-demand, and in-house production of masks. For the best seal performance, an individually personalized mask design might be recommended.
Air seal performance of personalized and statistically shaped 3D-printed face masks compared with market-available surgical and FFP2 masks
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has revealed alarming shortages of personal protective equipment for frontline healthcare professionals and the general public. Therefore, a 3D-printable mask frame was developed, and its air seal performance was evaluated and compared. Personalized masks (PM) based on individual face scans (n = 8) and a statistically shaped mask (SSM) based on a standardized facial soft tissue shape computed from 190 face scans were designed. Subsequently, the masks were additively manufactured, and in a second step, the PM and SSM were compared to surgical masks (SM) and FFP2 masks (FFP2) in terms of air seal performance. 3D-printed face models allowed for air leakage evaluation by measuring the pressure inside the mask in sealed and unsealed conditions during a breathing simulation. The PM demonstrated the lowest leak flow (p < 0.01) of inspired or expired unfiltered air of approximately 10.4 ± 16.4%, whereas the SM showed the highest (p < 0.01) leakage with 84.9 ± 7.7%. The FFP2 and SSM had similar values of 34.9 ± 18.5% leakage (p > 0.68). The developed framework allows for the time- and resource-efficient, on-demand, and in-house production of masks. For the best seal performance, an individually personalized mask design might be recommended.
Air seal performance of personalized and statistically shaped 3D-printed face masks compared with market-available surgical and FFP2 masks
Nold, Julian (author) / Metzger, Marc Christian (author) / Schwarz, Steffen (author) / Wesemann, Christian (author) / Wemken, Gregor (author) / Pieralli, Stefano (author) / Kernen, Florian (author) / Weingart, Julia Vera (author) / Schirmeister, Carl Gunther (author) / Schumann, Stefan (author)
2021-01-01
Scientific reports. - 11 (2021) , 19347, ISSN: 2045-2322
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Decontaminating N95/FFP2 masks for reuse during the COVID-19 epidemic: a systematic review
| BASE | 2021
Nanoparticle Filtration Performance of Commercially Available Dust Masks
| British Library Online Contents | 2008
Ventilation of ordinary face masks
| Elsevier | 2021
Filtration Performance of FDA-Cleared Surgical Masks
| British Library Online Contents | 2009