A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Examining Social Equity in the Co-Management of Terrestrial Protected Areas:Perceived Fairness of Local Communities in Giant Panda National Park, China
Social equity is imperative both morally and instrumentally in the governance of protected areas, as neglecting this consideration can result in feelings of injustice and thus jeopardize conservation objectives. Despite the progressive attention paid to conservation equity, few have linked it with co-management arrangements, especially in the context of terrestrial protected areas. This study assesses the fairness perceptions in China’s Giant Panda National Park from recognitional, procedural, and distributional dimensions, to further disclose their correlations with individuals’ characteristics and participation in co-management activities. The regression analysis shows that all co-management types (instruction, consultation, agreement, and cooperation) are significantly linked with certain directions of perceived social equity. One novel finding here is that alternative types of co-management activities are influencing social equity in different ways. In addition, our research discloses the effects of education across all equity categories, and location is merely significantly related to recognitional equity. These findings suggest more inclusive and empowered co-management endeavors to strive for more equitably managed protected areas. Crucial steps to advance this include extending participative channels, co-producing better compensation plans, strengthening locals’ conservation capabilities, etc. Herein, this study appeals to a greater focus on social equity issues in co-management regimes, and tailored actions should be taken to tackle specific local problems.
Examining Social Equity in the Co-Management of Terrestrial Protected Areas:Perceived Fairness of Local Communities in Giant Panda National Park, China
Social equity is imperative both morally and instrumentally in the governance of protected areas, as neglecting this consideration can result in feelings of injustice and thus jeopardize conservation objectives. Despite the progressive attention paid to conservation equity, few have linked it with co-management arrangements, especially in the context of terrestrial protected areas. This study assesses the fairness perceptions in China’s Giant Panda National Park from recognitional, procedural, and distributional dimensions, to further disclose their correlations with individuals’ characteristics and participation in co-management activities. The regression analysis shows that all co-management types (instruction, consultation, agreement, and cooperation) are significantly linked with certain directions of perceived social equity. One novel finding here is that alternative types of co-management activities are influencing social equity in different ways. In addition, our research discloses the effects of education across all equity categories, and location is merely significantly related to recognitional equity. These findings suggest more inclusive and empowered co-management endeavors to strive for more equitably managed protected areas. Crucial steps to advance this include extending participative channels, co-producing better compensation plans, strengthening locals’ conservation capabilities, etc. Herein, this study appeals to a greater focus on social equity issues in co-management regimes, and tailored actions should be taken to tackle specific local problems.
Examining Social Equity in the Co-Management of Terrestrial Protected Areas:Perceived Fairness of Local Communities in Giant Panda National Park, China
Chen, Qiujin (author) / Zhang, Yuqi (author) / Zhang, Yin (author) / Kong, Mingliang (author)
2022-10-01
Chen , Q , Zhang , Y , Zhang , Y & Kong , M 2022 , ' Examining Social Equity in the Co-Management of Terrestrial Protected Areas : Perceived Fairness of Local Communities in Giant Panda National Park, China ' , Land , vol. 11 , no. 10 , 1624 . https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101624
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
710