A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Upflow Direct Filtration and Downflow Direct Filtration: A Comparison with Emphasis on the Removal of Aerobic Spore-Forming Bacteria and Fluorescent Microspheres as Surrogates for Cryptosporidium Oocyst Removal
Monitoring the removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water treatment plants is a challenge, particularly in developing countries, and the use of surrogates has proven necessary. Two surrogates already investigated and recognized by the scientific community are aerobic spore-forming bacteria (ASFB) and fluorescent polystyrene microspheres (ME). In this context, this study evaluates and compares the performance of upflow direct filtration and downflow direct filtration, with emphasis on the removal of ASFB and ME as a surrogate of Cryptosporidium oocyst removal. Pilot filtration experiments were carried out with low turbidity Paranoá Lake water (average—3.7 NTU) with ASFB varying from 7 × 102 to 5.5 × 103 CFU/100 mL. In some experiments, water was spiked with microspheres, aiming for 105 ME/L. Two operational conditions were evaluated: (1) filters operating with the same filtration rate (5 m/h); (2) filters operating with the same flow rate of 59.41 L/h. In general, the downflow filter presented a slightly higher removal efficiency than the upflow filter but the differences were not considered statistically significant in most cases. The removal efficiency of microspheres (3 to 5 log) was higher than that of ASFB (1.2 to 4 log) in both filters, corroborating that the removal of ASFB is a conservative surrogate of the removal of Cryptosporidium.
Upflow Direct Filtration and Downflow Direct Filtration: A Comparison with Emphasis on the Removal of Aerobic Spore-Forming Bacteria and Fluorescent Microspheres as Surrogates for Cryptosporidium Oocyst Removal
Monitoring the removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water treatment plants is a challenge, particularly in developing countries, and the use of surrogates has proven necessary. Two surrogates already investigated and recognized by the scientific community are aerobic spore-forming bacteria (ASFB) and fluorescent polystyrene microspheres (ME). In this context, this study evaluates and compares the performance of upflow direct filtration and downflow direct filtration, with emphasis on the removal of ASFB and ME as a surrogate of Cryptosporidium oocyst removal. Pilot filtration experiments were carried out with low turbidity Paranoá Lake water (average—3.7 NTU) with ASFB varying from 7 × 102 to 5.5 × 103 CFU/100 mL. In some experiments, water was spiked with microspheres, aiming for 105 ME/L. Two operational conditions were evaluated: (1) filters operating with the same filtration rate (5 m/h); (2) filters operating with the same flow rate of 59.41 L/h. In general, the downflow filter presented a slightly higher removal efficiency than the upflow filter but the differences were not considered statistically significant in most cases. The removal efficiency of microspheres (3 to 5 log) was higher than that of ASFB (1.2 to 4 log) in both filters, corroborating that the removal of ASFB is a conservative surrogate of the removal of Cryptosporidium.
Upflow Direct Filtration and Downflow Direct Filtration: A Comparison with Emphasis on the Removal of Aerobic Spore-Forming Bacteria and Fluorescent Microspheres as Surrogates for Cryptosporidium Oocyst Removal
Álef Luan de Souza Pereira (author) / Cristina Celia Silveira Brandão (author) / Yovanka Pérez Ginoris (author) / Carla Patrícia Pereira Alves (author)
2023
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Cryptosporidium Oocysts Removal by Upflow Direct Filtration: Pilot Scale Assessment
| DOAJ | 2020
Microspheres as Surrogates for Cryptosporidium Filtration
| Wiley | 2004
High-Rate Direct Filtration for Giardia and Cryptosporidium Removal
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
Use of Biological and Non-Biological Surrogates for Evaluating Cryptosporidium Removal by Filtration
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011