A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Green Advertising in the Low-Carbon Supply Chain under Monopoly or Competitive Market
Customers feel a degree of ambiguity associated with low-carbon products, such as remanufactured products, and undervalue them. Although green advertising significantly impacts consumers’ acceptance of remanufactured products and the low-carbon supply chain (LCSC), limited research has been carried out on advertisement decisions for remanufactured products in the LCSC. This study introduces a two-echelon remanufacturing supply chain motivated by the practice of applying green advertising to update consumers’ low-carbon awareness. We use a game-theoretical approach to analyze the remanufacturer’s and retailer’s decisions on the green advertising program (non-coop vs. co-op green advertising) under different competitive scenarios in the LCSC. We find that the LCSC’s and the retailer’s profits are optimal in the non-coop green advertising under the monopoly, but the LCSC’s and the remanufacturer’s profits are optimal in the co-op green advertising under the competition. We suggest that the entry and royalty fees can be applied to coordinate the LCSC under different competitive scenarios.
Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Green Advertising in the Low-Carbon Supply Chain under Monopoly or Competitive Market
Customers feel a degree of ambiguity associated with low-carbon products, such as remanufactured products, and undervalue them. Although green advertising significantly impacts consumers’ acceptance of remanufactured products and the low-carbon supply chain (LCSC), limited research has been carried out on advertisement decisions for remanufactured products in the LCSC. This study introduces a two-echelon remanufacturing supply chain motivated by the practice of applying green advertising to update consumers’ low-carbon awareness. We use a game-theoretical approach to analyze the remanufacturer’s and retailer’s decisions on the green advertising program (non-coop vs. co-op green advertising) under different competitive scenarios in the LCSC. We find that the LCSC’s and the retailer’s profits are optimal in the non-coop green advertising under the monopoly, but the LCSC’s and the remanufacturer’s profits are optimal in the co-op green advertising under the competition. We suggest that the entry and royalty fees can be applied to coordinate the LCSC under different competitive scenarios.
Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Green Advertising in the Low-Carbon Supply Chain under Monopoly or Competitive Market
Hong Zeng (author) / Dongqin Jiang (author) / Yimeng Li (author)
2022
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Cooperative advertising for garment supply chain in dual channel system
| British Library Online Contents | 2013
Evolution of Cooperative Behaviors in Construction Supply Chain
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007