A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Interpretation of Machine-Learning-Based (Black-box) Wind Pressure Predictions for Low-Rise Gable-Roofed Buildings Using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)
Conventional methods of estimating pressure coefficients of buildings retain time and cost constraints. Recently, machine learning (ML) has been successfully established to predict wind pressure coefficients. However, regardless of the accuracy, ML models are incompetent in providing end-users’ confidence as a result of the black-box nature of predictions. In this study, we employed tree-based regression models (Decision Tree, XGBoost, Extra-tree, LightGBM) to predict surface-averaged mean pressure coefficient (Cp,mean), fluctuation pressure coefficient (Cp,rms), and peak pressure coefficient (Cp,peak) of low-rise gable-roofed buildings. The accuracy of models was verified using Tokyo Polytechnic University (TPU) wind tunnel data. Subsequently, we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to explain the black-box nature of the ML predictions. The comparison revealed that tree-based models are efficient and accurate in wind-predicting pressure coefficients. Interestingly, SHAP provided human-comprehensible explanations for the interaction of variables, the importance of features towards the outcome, and the underlying reasoning behind the predictions. Moreover, SHAP confirmed that tree-based predictions adhere to the flow physics of wind engineering, advancing the fidelity of ML-based predictions.
Interpretation of Machine-Learning-Based (Black-box) Wind Pressure Predictions for Low-Rise Gable-Roofed Buildings Using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)
Conventional methods of estimating pressure coefficients of buildings retain time and cost constraints. Recently, machine learning (ML) has been successfully established to predict wind pressure coefficients. However, regardless of the accuracy, ML models are incompetent in providing end-users’ confidence as a result of the black-box nature of predictions. In this study, we employed tree-based regression models (Decision Tree, XGBoost, Extra-tree, LightGBM) to predict surface-averaged mean pressure coefficient (Cp,mean), fluctuation pressure coefficient (Cp,rms), and peak pressure coefficient (Cp,peak) of low-rise gable-roofed buildings. The accuracy of models was verified using Tokyo Polytechnic University (TPU) wind tunnel data. Subsequently, we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to explain the black-box nature of the ML predictions. The comparison revealed that tree-based models are efficient and accurate in wind-predicting pressure coefficients. Interestingly, SHAP provided human-comprehensible explanations for the interaction of variables, the importance of features towards the outcome, and the underlying reasoning behind the predictions. Moreover, SHAP confirmed that tree-based predictions adhere to the flow physics of wind engineering, advancing the fidelity of ML-based predictions.
Interpretation of Machine-Learning-Based (Black-box) Wind Pressure Predictions for Low-Rise Gable-Roofed Buildings Using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)
Pasindu Meddage (author) / Imesh Ekanayake (author) / Udara Sachinthana Perera (author) / Hazi Md. Azamathulla (author) / Md Azlin Md Said (author) / Upaka Rathnayake (author)
2022
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Mean Wind Pressure Coefficients on Surfaces of Gable-Roofed Low-Rise Buildings
| SAGE Publications | 2007
Mean Wind Pressure Coefficients on Surfaces of Gable-Roofed Low-Rise Buildings
| Online Contents | 2007
| SAGE Publications | 2014