A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Nutrient chemistry and eutrophication risk assessment of the Ghaghara river, India
This study was carried out to evaluate the eutrophication risk associated with the nutrient flux from the Ghaghara river by using nutrient molar ratios and indicators for coastal eutrophication potential values. The concentration of ammonium (3–8 times), nitrate (3–10 times), and phosphate (3–4.5 times) in the Ghaghara river were higher than the reported value for the unpolluted rivers, indicating the contribution from the anthropogenic sources. The dissolved nutrients concentration showed significant seasonal variations in the Ghaghara river system. The specific yield of nitrate-N, phosphate-P, and dissolved silica-Si from the Ghaghara river were 0.49, 0.03 and 0.96 tons km−2 yr−1 respectively. The average molar ratio for dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN)/Dissolved inorganic Phosphate (DIP) was above 16:1, which indicated phosphate limitation in biological productivity. In contrast, an average molar ratio of Dissolved inorganic Silica (DSi)/DIN of 4.6 ± 4.4 favored the diatom growth in the Ghaghara river. The negative value of P-ICEP (-2.93 kg C. km−2day−1) indicated phosphate limitation in the Ghaghara river. The positive value of N-ICEP (1.71 kg C·km−2day−1) indicates an excess of nitrogen over silica transport from the Ghaghara river to the Ganga river, which can create an eutrophication problem in the Ganga river. HIGHLIGHTS Nutrient concentration is contributed by allochthonous and autochthonous sources.; Nitrate is a major species constituting the DIN load in the Ghaghara river.; Significant seasonal variation was observed in nutrients concentration.; Phosphate limits the primary productivity in the Ghaghara river.; A positive value of N-ICEP indicates the potential of eutrophication condition in the receiving Ganga water.;
Nutrient chemistry and eutrophication risk assessment of the Ghaghara river, India
This study was carried out to evaluate the eutrophication risk associated with the nutrient flux from the Ghaghara river by using nutrient molar ratios and indicators for coastal eutrophication potential values. The concentration of ammonium (3–8 times), nitrate (3–10 times), and phosphate (3–4.5 times) in the Ghaghara river were higher than the reported value for the unpolluted rivers, indicating the contribution from the anthropogenic sources. The dissolved nutrients concentration showed significant seasonal variations in the Ghaghara river system. The specific yield of nitrate-N, phosphate-P, and dissolved silica-Si from the Ghaghara river were 0.49, 0.03 and 0.96 tons km−2 yr−1 respectively. The average molar ratio for dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN)/Dissolved inorganic Phosphate (DIP) was above 16:1, which indicated phosphate limitation in biological productivity. In contrast, an average molar ratio of Dissolved inorganic Silica (DSi)/DIN of 4.6 ± 4.4 favored the diatom growth in the Ghaghara river. The negative value of P-ICEP (-2.93 kg C. km−2day−1) indicated phosphate limitation in the Ghaghara river. The positive value of N-ICEP (1.71 kg C·km−2day−1) indicates an excess of nitrogen over silica transport from the Ghaghara river to the Ganga river, which can create an eutrophication problem in the Ganga river. HIGHLIGHTS Nutrient concentration is contributed by allochthonous and autochthonous sources.; Nitrate is a major species constituting the DIN load in the Ghaghara river.; Significant seasonal variation was observed in nutrients concentration.; Phosphate limits the primary productivity in the Ghaghara river.; A positive value of N-ICEP indicates the potential of eutrophication condition in the receiving Ganga water.;
Nutrient chemistry and eutrophication risk assessment of the Ghaghara river, India
Nirdesh Kumar Ravi (author) / Atul Srivastava (author) / Kirpa Ram (author) / Pawan Kumar Jha (author)
2021
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Sediment and Nutrient Tradeoffs in Restoring Mississippi River Delta: Restoration vs Eutrophication
| Wiley | 2009
Nutrient Enrichment and Estuarine Eutrophication 1
| Wiley | 2007
Eutrophication assessment in cascade reservoirs of Dawen River
| British Library Online Contents | 2018
3D model system for hydrodynamics, eutrophication and nutrient transport
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
Sources of eutrophication: hydrological pathways of catchment nutrient export
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995