A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Analysing debate on infrastructures using abstract argumentation
Infrastructure projects induce various impacts on stakeholders, which can lead to a strong opposition to the project. In order to support urban planning, we propose a method called AFORI (Argumentation for Formalizing and analysing Opinions on Infrastructure project) based on the AIPA abstract argumentation model, to collect, formalize and analyse the views of the different stakeholders on the project. AFORI permits to collect data from various sources (newspaper, social media…), to formalize the pros and cons of argumentation relating to an infrastructure project and to provide an easier understanding of the debate. The structured formalization of the argumentation facilitates the understanding of the different points of view and their interdependence. AFORI was applied to a real case study in order to illustrate its functioning and interest.
Analysing debate on infrastructures using abstract argumentation
Infrastructure projects induce various impacts on stakeholders, which can lead to a strong opposition to the project. In order to support urban planning, we propose a method called AFORI (Argumentation for Formalizing and analysing Opinions on Infrastructure project) based on the AIPA abstract argumentation model, to collect, formalize and analyse the views of the different stakeholders on the project. AFORI permits to collect data from various sources (newspaper, social media…), to formalize the pros and cons of argumentation relating to an infrastructure project and to provide an easier understanding of the debate. The structured formalization of the argumentation facilitates the understanding of the different points of view and their interdependence. AFORI was applied to a real case study in order to illustrate its functioning and interest.
Analysing debate on infrastructures using abstract argumentation
F. Taillandier (author) / S. Guignard (author) / N. Pares (author) / C. Curt (author) / A. Schleyer-Lindenmann (author)
2023
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Analysing and evaluating argumentation in planning
| British Library Online Contents | 1998
Analysing and evaluating argumentation in planning
| Online Contents | 1998
Imprecise abstract argumentation as a support for forensic engineering
| Emerald Group Publishing | 2021
Online Contents | 1999