A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services Enables Better Informed Nature Protection and Landscape Management
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) have specific richness and diversity provision patterns related to particular landscape features and land cover forms. Studies of their spatial distribution, however, are quite rare in the Slovak Republic and surrounding countries. This paper links land cover information based on an ecosystem services (ES) matrix, field survey data and GIS method to assess CES supply in two selected Slovak regions. Our main focus is on the ecologically more valuable ‘hot-spots’ where socio-cultural values accumulate. We determined their spatial distribution, and our comparison with lower cultural value areas confirmed that mountainous landscapes have the highest capacity to provide CES. This especially applies to the landscapes under National Park protection. While Slovak forests, rocks and water areas also form essential ecosystems for overall CES provision, the lowest overall capacity is in areas with residential buildings, construction, industrial and other artificial habitats. Finally, a comparison of our results with the National Ecosystem Assessment indicates that our detailed CES assessment will be more effective in supporting future participatory planning and management processes.
Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services Enables Better Informed Nature Protection and Landscape Management
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) have specific richness and diversity provision patterns related to particular landscape features and land cover forms. Studies of their spatial distribution, however, are quite rare in the Slovak Republic and surrounding countries. This paper links land cover information based on an ecosystem services (ES) matrix, field survey data and GIS method to assess CES supply in two selected Slovak regions. Our main focus is on the ecologically more valuable ‘hot-spots’ where socio-cultural values accumulate. We determined their spatial distribution, and our comparison with lower cultural value areas confirmed that mountainous landscapes have the highest capacity to provide CES. This especially applies to the landscapes under National Park protection. While Slovak forests, rocks and water areas also form essential ecosystems for overall CES provision, the lowest overall capacity is in areas with residential buildings, construction, industrial and other artificial habitats. Finally, a comparison of our results with the National Ecosystem Assessment indicates that our detailed CES assessment will be more effective in supporting future participatory planning and management processes.
Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services Enables Better Informed Nature Protection and Landscape Management
Gréta Vrbičanová (author) / Dominika Kaisová (author) / Matej Močko (author) / František Petrovič (author) / Peter Mederly (author)
2020
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
The Cultural Ecosystem Services as an Element Supporting Manor Landscape Protection
DOAJ | 2022
|Recording Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Landscape
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|Recording Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Landscape
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2013
|Recording Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Landscape
Online Contents | 2013
|Recording Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Landscape
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|