A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Data-driven estimation of joint roughness coefficient
Joint roughness is one of the most important issues in the hydromechanical behavior of rock mass. Therefore, the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation is of paramount importance in geomechanics engineering applications. Studies show that the application of statistical parameters alone may not produce a sufficiently reliable estimation of the JRC values. Therefore, alternative data-driven methods are proposed to assess the JRC values. In this study, Gaussian process (GP), K-star, random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models are employed, and their performance and accuracy are compared with those of benchmark regression formula (i.e. Z2, Rp, and SDi) for the JRC estimation. To analyze the models’ performance, 112 rock joint profile datasets having eight common statistical parameters (Rave, Rmax, SDh, iave, SDi, Z2, Rp, and SF) and one output variable (JRC) are utilized, of which 89 and 23 datasets are used for training and validation of models, respectively. The interpretability of the developed XGBoost model is presented in terms of feature importance ranking, partial dependence plots (PDPs), feature interaction, and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) techniques. Analyses of results show that machine learning models demonstrate higher accuracy and precision for estimating JRC values compared with the benchmark empirical equations, indicating the generalization ability of the data-driven models in better estimation accuracy.
Data-driven estimation of joint roughness coefficient
Joint roughness is one of the most important issues in the hydromechanical behavior of rock mass. Therefore, the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation is of paramount importance in geomechanics engineering applications. Studies show that the application of statistical parameters alone may not produce a sufficiently reliable estimation of the JRC values. Therefore, alternative data-driven methods are proposed to assess the JRC values. In this study, Gaussian process (GP), K-star, random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models are employed, and their performance and accuracy are compared with those of benchmark regression formula (i.e. Z2, Rp, and SDi) for the JRC estimation. To analyze the models’ performance, 112 rock joint profile datasets having eight common statistical parameters (Rave, Rmax, SDh, iave, SDi, Z2, Rp, and SF) and one output variable (JRC) are utilized, of which 89 and 23 datasets are used for training and validation of models, respectively. The interpretability of the developed XGBoost model is presented in terms of feature importance ranking, partial dependence plots (PDPs), feature interaction, and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) techniques. Analyses of results show that machine learning models demonstrate higher accuracy and precision for estimating JRC values compared with the benchmark empirical equations, indicating the generalization ability of the data-driven models in better estimation accuracy.
Data-driven estimation of joint roughness coefficient
Hadi Fathipour-Azar (author)
2021
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Estimation of Joint Roughness Coefficient from Three-Dimensional Discontinuity Surface
| British Library Online Contents | 2017
Estimation of the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) by Visual Comparison
| British Library Online Contents | 2002
Reassessing the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) Estimation Using Z2
| Springer Verlag | 2001
Reassessing the Joint Roughness Coefficient (JRC) Estimation Using $ Z_{2} $
| Online Contents | 2001
Estimation of Joint Roughness Coefficient from Three-Dimensional Discontinuity Surface
| Online Contents | 2017