A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Implications of Indian Supreme Court's Innovations for Environmental Jurisprudence
This paper analyses the implications of innovative methods of the Indian Supreme Court for environmental jurisprudence to protect and improve the environment. Innovative methods are understood in terms of application and creation of new principle and structure for environmental jurisprudence. Through a series of innovative methods the Supreme Court of India has not only ensured fundamental right of citizen to healthy environment but also has contributed immensely to the evolution of new principles in environmental jurisprudence. The Court's innovations for environmental jurisprudence, however, have neither been institutionalised for their long term impact nor have they been consistent and uniform in their application for the protection and improvement of environment. It is also observed that there has been opposition to Court innovations both by the implementing agencies and public, as the Court through its application of new methods and creation of structures for environmental protection has crossed its adjudication boundaries thereby started interfering in all affairs of environmental management.
Implications of Indian Supreme Court's Innovations for Environmental Jurisprudence
This paper analyses the implications of innovative methods of the Indian Supreme Court for environmental jurisprudence to protect and improve the environment. Innovative methods are understood in terms of application and creation of new principle and structure for environmental jurisprudence. Through a series of innovative methods the Supreme Court of India has not only ensured fundamental right of citizen to healthy environment but also has contributed immensely to the evolution of new principles in environmental jurisprudence. The Court's innovations for environmental jurisprudence, however, have neither been institutionalised for their long term impact nor have they been consistent and uniform in their application for the protection and improvement of environment. It is also observed that there has been opposition to Court innovations both by the implementing agencies and public, as the Court through its application of new methods and creation of structures for environmental protection has crossed its adjudication boundaries thereby started interfering in all affairs of environmental management.
Implications of Indian Supreme Court's Innovations for Environmental Jurisprudence
Geetanjoy Sahu (author)
2008
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Colorado Supreme Court Extends Water Court's Jurisdiction
| Wiley | 2002
Federal Regulation of Wetlands in Aftermath of Supreme Court's Decision in SWANCC v. United States
| Online Contents | 2002
Federal Regulation of Wetlands in Aftermath of Supreme Court's Decision in SWANCC v. United States
| British Library Online Contents | 2002
No Wrong Without a Remedy: The New Jersey Supreme Court's Effort to Bar Exclusionary Zoning
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1986