A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Innovationsförderung und Verwaltung: Das Beispiel der Freien Hansestadt Bremen
The paper presents the thesis that the administration should be the target for innovation research. In the context of the promotion of innovations the administration deals with a threefold paradox. Innovations are non-intendable, the administration forms a non-innovative environment and the administration is dependent on majority decisions. Using the Free Hanseatic City of Bremen as a case study the paper scrutinizes the internal handling of these obstacles of the administration. As a main empirical finding it shows up that presentation and delegation are the main methods the administration uses to encounter its own endogenous resistances in the context of the promotion of innovation.
Innovationsförderung und Verwaltung: Das Beispiel der Freien Hansestadt Bremen
The paper presents the thesis that the administration should be the target for innovation research. In the context of the promotion of innovations the administration deals with a threefold paradox. Innovations are non-intendable, the administration forms a non-innovative environment and the administration is dependent on majority decisions. Using the Free Hanseatic City of Bremen as a case study the paper scrutinizes the internal handling of these obstacles of the administration. As a main empirical finding it shows up that presentation and delegation are the main methods the administration uses to encounter its own endogenous resistances in the context of the promotion of innovation.
Innovationsförderung und Verwaltung: Das Beispiel der Freien Hansestadt Bremen
Peter Dirksmeier (author)
2009
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Innovationsförderung und Verwaltung: Das Beispiel der Freien Hansestadt Bremen
Online Contents | 2009
|Parks und Gärten in der Freien Hansestadt Bremen
TIBKAT | 1978
|