A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Design versus Discourse
This article reviews the various periods which can be distinguished in the official teaching of architecture in Croatia, emphasizing on the relationship between socialist ideology and architecture in the 1950s and the 1960s. After the Second World War, Yugoslavia rejected soviet socialist realism and artistic practice achieved considerable autonomy. But the socialist project demanded two tasks from architecture: representation of the new society and urbanization. Thus, the priority for higher education was mass production of professionals. Architecture, seen as a synthesis of art and engineering, progressed with the general economic development and was often identified with the construction industry. Limited theoretical research and absence of critical thinking produced stagnation. Instead of giving way to a critical theory as a basis for the students’ intellectual development, the fading of the socialist Project strengthened concepts which followed the professors’ personal poetics. The Architecture Faculty of Zagreb continued to legitimize its modernist curriculum. The artistic and conceptual trends developed at the faculty since the late 1970s replaced the long awaited critical discourse, which began to appear only in the 1980s with the arrival of the first professionals trained in the U.S.A.
Design versus Discourse
This article reviews the various periods which can be distinguished in the official teaching of architecture in Croatia, emphasizing on the relationship between socialist ideology and architecture in the 1950s and the 1960s. After the Second World War, Yugoslavia rejected soviet socialist realism and artistic practice achieved considerable autonomy. But the socialist project demanded two tasks from architecture: representation of the new society and urbanization. Thus, the priority for higher education was mass production of professionals. Architecture, seen as a synthesis of art and engineering, progressed with the general economic development and was often identified with the construction industry. Limited theoretical research and absence of critical thinking produced stagnation. Instead of giving way to a critical theory as a basis for the students’ intellectual development, the fading of the socialist Project strengthened concepts which followed the professors’ personal poetics. The Architecture Faculty of Zagreb continued to legitimize its modernist curriculum. The artistic and conceptual trends developed at the faculty since the late 1970s replaced the long awaited critical discourse, which began to appear only in the 1980s with the arrival of the first professionals trained in the U.S.A.
Design versus Discourse
Maroje Mrduljas (author) / Dafne Berc (author)
2021
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Hermeneutics as Discourse in Design
| British Library Online Contents | 1999
Where is the Urban Design Discourse?
| British Library Online Contents | 2007
Interaction Dynamics in Collaborative Design Discourse
| Wiley | 1999